SalPa vs FC jazz Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
50.9%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
78.8%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
82.2%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
SalPa
FC jazz
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
SalPa
19 matches
FC jazz
20 matches
| SalPa | Statistic | FC jazz |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Wins | 7 |
| 6 | Draws | 5 |
| 5 | Losses | 8 |
| 34 | Goals For | 28 |
| 31 | Goals Against | 32 |
| 1.79 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.4 |
| 1.63 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.6 |
| 12 | BTTS Yes | 13 |
| 17 | Over 1.5 | 18 |
| 12 | Over 2.5 | 12 |
| 8 | Over 3.5 | 7 |
| 3 | Clean Sheets | 3 |
| 4 | Failed To Score | 4 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From a tactical perspective, this fixture features SalPa's more proactive style and FC jazz's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. A relatively balanced game with moderate goal potential looks most likely. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors FC jazz. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward FC jazz having the stronger overall control. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest.
Operating from 4 place with 29 points from 18 games, SalPa bring one of the stronger season profiles into this match. With 8 wins, 5 draws, and 5 defeats plus a goal balance of 33:30, they continue to show good form over their recent run. Their attacking quality is driven by their main attacking players, and at the back they have appeared fairly stable. At home, the split of 5 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses supports the view of a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their football identity still points toward balanced attacking football.
FC jazz are currently 8 in the standings with 25 points from 18 matches. Their overall return of 7 wins, 4 draws, and 7 losses with goals at 26:27 reflects mixed form over their recent run. Their attacking weight is carried by their main attacking players, while defensively they have appeared fairly stable. Away from home, their split return of 5 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses fits a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they usually display a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 15 head-to-head meetings, SalPa won 6 times, FC jazz won 4 times, while 5 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 22:20 from SalPa's perspective. 8 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 9 matches, with an average of 2.8 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 50:20 | 30 | 47 |
W
L
W
D
D
|
|
| 2 | 23 | 11 | 8 | 4 | 48:33 | 15 | 41 |
D
W
L
D
W
|
|
| 3 |
SalPa
Home
|
23 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 45:38 | 7 | 39 |
W
W
W
L
D
|
| 4 |
FC jazz
Away
|
23 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 35:29 | 6 | 36 |
W
W
D
W
D
|
| 5 | 23 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 42:33 | 9 | 35 |
L
W
D
D
W
|
|
| 6 | 23 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 44:36 | 8 | 35 |
D
W
L
D
D
|
|
| 7 | 23 | 8 | 10 | 5 | 40:32 | 8 | 34 |
W
L
D
D
W
|
|
| 8 | 23 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 54:46 | 8 | 31 |
L
W
D
D
D
|
|
| 9 | 23 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 34:42 | -8 | 27 |
W
L
W
D
D
|
|
| 10 | 23 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 33:53 | -20 | 20 |
L
L
L
L
L
|
|
| 11 | 23 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 39:55 | -16 | 15 |
L
L
W
D
L
|
|
| 12 | 23 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 24:71 | -47 | 15 |
L
L
L
W
L
|