Login Register
DENMARK › 2. DIVISION
10.10.2026 12:00
FA 2000
Match Timeline
Naestved
HT
0' 15' 30' 45' 60' 75' 90'
⚽
38'
M. Rugaard
Naestved
⚽
90+4'
W. Ravn
FA 2000

FA 2000 vs Naestved Prediction & Match Analysis

Full analysis and predictions for all markets

1X2
Away Win
Probability 64.6%
Odds 1.92
BTTS
Yes
Probability 88%
Odds 1.67
Over / Under 2.5
Over 2.5
Probability 72%
Odds 1.73
All Markets
Market Option Probability Odds Stats & Analysis
1X2 Away Win
64.6%
1.92 ▥
BTTS Yes
88%
1.67 ▥
Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5
72%
1.73 ▥
Corners O/U Over 7.5 Corners
87.7%
- ▥
HT / FT Draw / Away
-
5.00 ▥
Correct Score 1-2
-
9.00 ▥
Probability Distribution
FA 2000 Win 26%
Draw 9.4%
Naestved Win 64.6%
Expected Goals (xG)
FA 20001.03
Naestved1.68
Recent Form (Last 5)
FA 2000 FA 2000
WWDLW
16 GF / 36 GA
Naestved Naestved
WLDWL
35 GF / 30 GA
Key Stats
0.89
Average Goals Scored
1.46
2
Average Goals Conceded
1.25
10
BTTS Yes
17
10
Over 2.5
9
0
Shots on Goal
0

Statistics are based on season averages

Season Statistics

Team averages and season trends before this fixture

FA 2000 FA 2000 18 matches
Naestved Naestved 24 matches
FA 2000 Statistic Naestved
2 Wins 7
4 Draws 14
12 Losses 3
16 Goals For 35
36 Goals Against 30
0.89 Avg Goals Scored 1.46
2 Avg Goals Conceded 1.25
10 BTTS Yes 17
14 Over 1.5 21
10 Over 2.5 9
6 Over 3.5 8
3 Clean Sheets 5
6 Failed To Score 3
0 Shots On Goal 0
0 Total Shots 0
0 Corners 0
0% Ball Possession 0%

Match Analysis

Model notes, team context and key prediction signals

Final Verdict

From the opening view, this looks like a meeting between teams arriving with different levels of stability, reinforced by Naestved's more proactive style and FA 2000's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors Naestved. FA 2000 have shown more instability in their recent run, so confidence and game management may become important factors. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Naestved having the stronger overall control. Naestved carry the stronger overall league profile, standing 6 with 15 points while FA 2000 sit 11 on 5, suggesting a clearer edge in long-term output. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent.

FA 2000 Analysis

FA 2000 sit 11 with 5 points after 10 matches and remain under pressure to produce steadier results. The overall return of 1 wins, 2 draws, and 7 defeats with a 10:22 goal balance points toward poor form and are going through a difficult losing run. Going forward they depend heavily on their main attacking players, while defensively they have looked very solid. At home, they have managed 0 wins, 1 draws, and 3 losses, a return that supports a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. In football terms they often show a more cautious and defensive approach.

Naestved Analysis

From their first 10 matches, Naestved have collected 15 points and now occupy 6 place in the table. The record of 3 wins, 6 draws, and 1 defeats, together with a 14:12 goal balance, points toward poor form and have been stuck in a sequence of draws. Much of their attacking threat comes through their main attacking players, while at the back they have looked very solid. Away from home, their split return of 2 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses fits a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Stylistically, they usually display balanced attacking football.

H2H Analysis

Across those 4 head-to-head meetings, FA 2000 won 2 times, Naestved won 1 times, while 1 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 6:4 from FA 2000's perspective. 3 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 3 matches, with an average of 2.5 goals per game.

1X2: Away Win
BTTS: Yes
Over/Under 2.5: Over 2.5
Highest model probability: 12 (90.6%)
H2H summary: FA 2000 wins 2, draws 1, Naestved wins 1

Standings

2nd Division
# Team MP W D L G GD PTS Form
1 12 7 4 1 30:15 15 25
L W D D W
2 11 5 6 0 21:10 11 21
W W D W D
3 12 4 7 1 17:14 3 19
W D D D D
4 11 5 3 3 15:10 5 18
L L W D D
5 12 5 3 4 20:16 4 18
L W W W L
6 11 4 5 2 19:13 6 17
L W D D D
7 12 4 5 3 16:18 -2 17
W L L W D
8 11 4 2 5 13:15 -2 14
L W L W D
9 11 3 3 5 13:18 -5 12
W W D L D
10 11 2 3 6 9:19 -10 9
D L D L L
11 11 1 3 7 11:23 -12 6
D L L L L
12 11 1 2 8 9:22 -13 5
D L L W L
Promotion - 2nd Division (Promotion Group)
2nd Division (Relegation Group)