Predictions & Statistics
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Away Win |
66.1%
|
- | |
| BTTS | BTTS No |
54.5%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
63.2%
|
- |
Bandırmaspor
Amed
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Bandırmaspor
35 matches
Amed
35 matches
| Bandırmaspor | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Wins | 21 |
| 11 | Draws | 9 |
| 10 | Losses | 5 |
| 43 | Goals For | 77 |
| 33 | Goals Against | 36 |
| 1.23 | Avg Goals Scored | 2.2 |
| 0.94 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.03 |
| 14 | BTTS Yes | 19 |
| 24 | Over 1.5 | 30 |
| 13 | Over 2.5 | 21 |
| 6 | Over 3.5 | 11 |
| 15 | Clean Sheets | 13 |
| 11 | Failed To Score | 5 |
| 3.74 | Shots On Goal | 5.51 |
| 10.74 | Total Shots | 15.26 |
| 4 | Corners | 5.8 |
| 45.3% | Ball Possession | 53% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From a tactical perspective, this fixture features two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward Amed. Both teams appear likely to operate from a similar base structure, so execution within the same shape could be more decisive than formation itself. The attacking numbers of both teams point toward a more open scoring environment.This game has the potential to be open, with both sides capable of creating several scoring chances. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day.
Bandırmaspor are currently 8 in the standings with 53 points from 35 matches. The record of 14 wins, 11 draws, and 10 defeats, together with a 43:33 goal balance, points toward poor form over their recent run. Much of their attacking threat comes through Douglas Tanque (12 goals), Leandro Bacuna (9 goals), Atınç Nukan (3 goals), with creative support from M. Gumuskaya (6 assists), D. Ndongala (5 assists), Leandro Bacuna (4 assists), while at the back they have looked fairly stable. At home, the record of 9 wins, 5 draws, and 3 losses points toward a very strong split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Their broader style still suggests balanced attacking football.
Operating from 2 place with 72 points from 35 games, Amed bring one of the stronger season profiles into this match. With 21 wins, 9 draws, and 5 defeats plus a goal balance of 75:34, they continue to show good form over their recent run. Their attacking quality is driven by M. Diagne (29 goals), Daniel Moreno (9 goals), D. Saba (8 goals), with creative support from M. Ucar (9 assists), D. Saba (8 assists), F. Afena-Gyan (6 assists), and at the back they have appeared fairly stable. Away from home, the split of 7 wins, 5 draws, and 5 losses supports the view of a fairly balanced split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Their football identity still points toward balanced attacking football.
Across those 6 head-to-head meetings, Bandırmaspor won 1 times, Amed won 4 times, while 1 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 8:10 from Bandırmaspor's perspective. 4 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 4 matches, with an average of 3 goals per game.
Bandırmaspor
5
4
3
5
1
9
Lineups
Bandırmaspor
Sivasspor
Bandırmaspor
Erzurumspor FK
Bandırmaspor
Bodrum FK
Bandırmaspor
Sarıyer
Bandırmaspor
Çorum FK
Bandırmaspor
Boluspor
Bandırmaspor
Iğdır FK
Bandırmaspor
Esenler Erokspor
Bandırmaspor
İstanbulspor
Bandırmaspor
Ümraniyespor
Bandırmaspor
Hatayspor
Bandırmaspor
Manisa F.K.
Bandırmaspor
Serik Spor
Bandırmaspor
Keçiörengücü
Bandırmaspor
Vanspor FK
Bandırmaspor
Adana Demirspor
Bandırmaspor
Pendikspor
Bandırmaspor
Sakaryaspor
Bandırmaspor
Sivasspor
Bandırmaspor
Erzurumspor FK
Amed
Iğdır FK
Amed
Bodrum FK
Amed
Ümraniyespor
Amed
Esenler Erokspor
Amed
Boluspor
Amed
Hatayspor
Amed
Manisa F.K.
Amed
İstanbulspor
Amed
Serik Spor
Amed
Keçiörengücü
Amed
Vanspor FK
Amed
Sarıyer
Amed
Sakaryaspor
Amed
Pendikspor
Amed
Adana Demirspor
Amed
Sivasspor
Amed
Erzurumspor FK
Amed
Çorum FK
Amed
Iğdır FK
Amed
Bodrum FK
Bandırmaspor
Sivasspor
Bandırmaspor
Sarıyer
Bandırmaspor
Iğdır FK
Bandırmaspor
İstanbulspor
Bandırmaspor
Hatayspor
Bandırmaspor
Serik Spor
Bandırmaspor
Vanspor FK
Bandırmaspor
Pendikspor
Bandırmaspor
Erzurumspor FK
Bandırmaspor
Bodrum FK
Bandırmaspor
Çorum FK
Bandırmaspor
Boluspor
Bandırmaspor
Esenler Erokspor
Bandırmaspor
Ümraniyespor
Bandırmaspor
Manisa F.K.
Bandırmaspor
Keçiörengücü
Bandırmaspor
Adana Demirspor
Bandırmaspor
Sakaryaspor
Amed
Iğdır FK
Amed
Esenler Erokspor
Amed
Hatayspor
Amed
İstanbulspor
Amed
Keçiörengücü
Amed
Sarıyer
Amed
Pendikspor
Amed
Sivasspor
Amed
Erzurumspor FK
Amed
Bodrum FK
Amed
Ümraniyespor
Amed
Boluspor
Amed
Manisa F.K.
Amed
Serik Spor
Amed
Vanspor FK
Amed
Sakaryaspor
Amed
Adana Demirspor
Amed
Çorum FK
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | 23 | 12 | 3 | 82:27 | 55 | 81 |
D
D
D
W
W
|
|
| 2 |
Amed
Away
|
38 | 21 | 11 | 6 | 81:42 | 39 | 74 |
D
D
L
D
D
|
| 3 | 38 | 21 | 11 | 6 | 81:35 | 46 | 74 |
L
D
L
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 38 | 21 | 8 | 9 | 63:39 | 24 | 71 |
W
W
L
W
D
|
|
| 5 | 38 | 18 | 10 | 10 | 71:39 | 32 | 64 |
L
W
W
L
D
|
|
| 6 | 38 | 16 | 15 | 7 | 58:33 | 25 | 63 |
L
D
W
D
D
|
|
| 7 | 38 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 73:43 | 30 | 60 |
L
W
W
L
D
|
|
| 8 |
Bandırmaspor
Home
|
38 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 47:34 | 13 | 60 |
W
D
W
D
D
|
| 9 | 38 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 57:56 | 1 | 55 |
W
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 10 | 38 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 47:43 | 4 | 53 |
L
W
L
L
W
|
|
| 11 | 38 | 13 | 13 | 12 | 57:55 | 2 | 52 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 12 | 38 | 15 | 7 | 16 | 44:44 | 0 | 52 |
W
W
L
W
D
|
|
| 13 | 38 | 13 | 11 | 14 | 52:54 | -2 | 50 |
D
L
D
W
L
|
|
| 14 | 38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 52:47 | 5 | 49 |
L
L
W
L
W
|
|
| 15 | 38 | 14 | 6 | 18 | 61:57 | 4 | 48 |
W
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 16 | 38 | 13 | 7 | 18 | 47:51 | -4 | 46 |
L
W
L
D
W
|
|
| 17 | 38 | 11 | 6 | 21 | 44:75 | -31 | 39 |
L
W
L
D
L
|
|
| 18 | 38 | 8 | 10 | 20 | 45:72 | -27 | 34 |
L
L
D
L
L
|
|
| 19 | 38 | 2 | 8 | 28 | 33:102 | -69 | 14 |
W
L
D
L
W
|
|
| 20 | 38 | 1 | 3 | 34 | 22:169 | -147 | -57 |
L
L
L
L
L
|