Predictions & Statistics
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
88%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
58.2%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
52.4%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
92%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
Lillestrom
KFUM Oslo
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Lillestrom
25 matches
KFUM Oslo
20 matches
| Lillestrom | Statistic | KFUM Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Wins | 4 |
| 4 | Draws | 6 |
| 10 | Losses | 10 |
| 49 | Goals For | 21 |
| 35 | Goals Against | 37 |
| 1.96 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.05 |
| 1.4 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.85 |
| 13 | BTTS Yes | 10 |
| 19 | Over 1.5 | 17 |
| 14 | Over 2.5 | 9 |
| 12 | Over 3.5 | 6 |
| 7 | Clean Sheets | 5 |
| 7 | Failed To Score | 6 |
| 4.58 | Shots On Goal | 4.17 |
| 13.17 | Total Shots | 10.83 |
| 5.25 | Corners | 4.17 |
| 52.2% | Ball Possession | 46.4% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From the opening view, this looks like a meeting between teams arriving with different levels of stability, reinforced by Lillestrom's more proactive style and KFUM Oslo's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward KFUM Oslo. Lillestrom arrive from the stronger league position, sitting 4 with 22 points compared to KFUM Oslo in 14 on 12, which underlines the gap in season consistency. The shape dynamic also adds another layer here, with Lillestrom expected to line up in 4-2-3-1 and KFUM Oslo in 3-4-1-2, which may reinforce the expected flow toward KFUM Oslo having the stronger overall control. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest.
With 22 points from 12 games and a place of 4, Lillestrom still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. Across the season they have posted 7 wins, 1 draws, and 4 defeats, and the 19:11 goal record continues to suggest mixed form over their recent run. Their attacking burden often falls on Markus Karlsbakk (4 goals), Gustav Kjolstad Nyheim (3 goals), Salieu Drammeh (2 goals), with creative support from Felix Vá (5 assists), Salieu Drammeh (1 assists), Thomas Lehne Olsen (1 assists), while at the back they have been very solid. At home, they have managed 3 wins, 0 draws, and 2 losses, a return that supports a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. In football terms they often show balanced attacking football.
With 12 points from 12 games and a place of 14, KFUM Oslo still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. The overall return of 3 wins, 3 draws, and 6 defeats with a 12:19 goal balance points toward poor form over their recent run. Going forward they depend heavily on Magnus Grødem (2 goals), Teodor Haltvik (2 goals), Simen Hestnes (1 goals), with creative support from Jonas Lange Hjorth (2 assists), Simen Hestnes (1 assists), Magnus Wolff Eikrem (1 assists), while defensively they have looked very solid. Away from home, they have managed 0 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses, a return that supports a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. In football terms they often show a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 11 head-to-head meetings, Lillestrom won 8 times, KFUM Oslo won 2 times, while 1 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 23:15 from Lillestrom's perspective. 7 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 7 matches, with an average of 3.45 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 47:14 | 33 | 44 |
W
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 18 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 42:18 | 24 | 43 |
W
L
W
W
D
|
|
| 3 | 18 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 34:20 | 14 | 35 |
D
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 18 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 36:29 | 7 | 30 |
W
W
L
D
W
|
|
| 5 | 18 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 36:27 | 9 | 26 |
D
W
W
L
W
|
|
| 6 |
Lillestrom
Home
|
18 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 24:25 | -1 | 26 |
L
D
L
L
L
|
| 7 | 18 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 22:28 | -6 | 26 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 8 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 27:26 | 1 | 24 |
L
W
W
L
W
|
|
| 9 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 20:23 | -3 | 23 |
D
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 10 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 26:32 | -6 | 23 |
D
L
D
W
L
|
|
| 11 | 18 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 31:38 | -7 | 21 |
L
D
L
L
W
|
|
| 12 | 18 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 15:23 | -8 | 19 |
D
W
L
L
L
|
|
| 13 |
KFUM Oslo
Away
|
18 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 20:31 | -11 | 19 |
L
D
W
W
L
|
| 14 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 17:29 | -12 | 16 |
D
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 15 | 18 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 28:43 | -15 | 15 |
L
D
D
L
D
|
|
| 16 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 20:39 | -19 | 13 |
W
L
L
W
L
|