Predictions & Statistics
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
61.7%
|
- | |
| BTTS | BTTS Yes |
82.6%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
75.9%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
92%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
Inter Miami
Portland Timbers
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Inter Miami
19 matches
Portland Timbers
17 matches
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Wins | 5 |
| 7 | Draws | 4 |
| 3 | Losses | 8 |
| 38 | Goals For | 29 |
| 32 | Goals Against | 32 |
| 2 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.71 |
| 1.68 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.88 |
| 14 | BTTS Yes | 11 |
| 17 | Over 1.5 | 15 |
| 14 | Over 2.5 | 11 |
| 9 | Over 3.5 | 9 |
| 3 | Clean Sheets | 2 |
| 4 | Failed To Score | 5 |
| 6.13 | Shots On Goal | 4.17 |
| 15 | Total Shots | 11.58 |
| 5.53 | Corners | 4.25 |
| 58.4% | Ball Possession | 47.9% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From the opening view, this looks like a meeting between teams arriving with different levels of stability, reinforced by Inter Miami's more proactive style and Portland Timbers's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. The shape dynamic also adds another layer here, with Inter Miami expected to line up in 3-4-3 and Portland Timbers in 4-2-3-1, which may reinforce the expected flow toward Portland Timbers having the stronger overall control. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors Portland Timbers. Inter Miami arrive from the stronger league position, sitting 3 with 22 points compared to Portland Timbers in 12 on 13, which underlines the gap in season consistency.
Inter Miami come into this fixture from a strong position, holding 3 place with 22 points after 12 matches. With 6 wins, 4 draws, and 2 defeats plus a goal balance of 26:21, they continue to show good form over their recent run. Their attacking quality is driven by L. Messi (9 goals), G. Berterame (3 goals), L. Suarez (3 goals), with creative support from Telasco Segovia (5 assists), L. Messi (3 assists), Rodrigo de Paul (3 assists), and at the back they have appeared very solid. At home, they have managed 0 wins, 3 draws, and 1 losses, which underlines a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. In stylistic terms they continue to show balanced attacking football.
From their first 11 matches, Portland Timbers have collected 13 points and now occupy 12 place in the table. Their overall return of 4 wins, 1 draws, and 6 losses with goals at 19:21 reflects good form over their recent run. Their attacking weight is carried by K. Kelsy (4 goals), K. Velde (4 goals), A. Lassiter (2 goals), with creative support from C. Bassett (2 assists), K. Kelsy (1 assists), Antony (1 assists), while defensively they have appeared very solid. Away from home, the record of 1 wins, 0 draws, and 5 losses points toward a weak split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Their broader style still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 3 head-to-head meetings, Inter Miami won 2 times, Portland Timbers won 1 times, while 0 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 4:2 from Inter Miami's perspective. 1 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 1 matches, with an average of 2 goals per game.
Inter Miami
9
4
7
6
6
6
Lineups
Inter Miami
Philadelphia Union
Inter Miami
FC Cincinnati
Inter Miami
Toronto FC
Inter Miami
Orlando City SC
Inter Miami
New England Revolution
Inter Miami
Real Salt Lake
Inter Miami
Colorado Rapids
Inter Miami
New York Red Bulls
Inter Miami
Austin
Inter Miami
New York City FC
Inter Miami
Nashville SC
Inter Miami
Charlotte
Inter Miami
Nashville SC
Inter Miami
DC United
Inter Miami
Orlando City SC
Inter Miami
Independiente del Valle
Inter Miami
Los Angeles FC
Inter Miami
Barcelona SC
Inter Miami
Atletico Nacional
Inter Miami
Alianza Lima
Portland Timbers
San Jose Earthquakes
Portland Timbers
CF Montreal
Portland Timbers
Sporting Kansas City
Portland Timbers
Real Salt Lake
Portland Timbers
San Diego
Portland Timbers
Minnesota United FC
Portland Timbers
Los Angeles FC
Portland Timbers
Vancouver Whitecaps
Portland Timbers
Los Angeles Galaxy
Portland Timbers
Houston Dynamo
Portland Timbers
Vancouver Whitecaps
Portland Timbers
Colorado Rapids
Portland Timbers
Columbus Crew
Portland Timbers
Chicago Fire
Portland Timbers
San Jose Earthquakes
Portland Timbers
DC United
Portland Timbers
Los Angeles FC
Portland Timbers
Los Angeles Galaxy
Inter Miami
Philadelphia Union
Inter Miami
Orlando City SC
Inter Miami
New England Revolution
Inter Miami
New York Red Bulls
Inter Miami
Austin
Inter Miami
Nashville SC
Portland Timbers
CF Montreal
Portland Timbers
Real Salt Lake
Portland Timbers
San Diego
Portland Timbers
Minnesota United FC
Portland Timbers
Vancouver Whitecaps
Portland Timbers
Houston Dynamo
Portland Timbers
Colorado Rapids
Portland Timbers
Chicago Fire
Portland Timbers
San Jose Earthquakes
Portland Timbers
Los Angeles FC
Portland Timbers
Los Angeles Galaxy
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 31:11 | 20 | 33 |
W
W
W
D
D
|
|
| 2 |
Inter Miami
Home
|
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 39:28 | 11 | 31 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
| 3 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 27:16 | 11 | 26 |
W
W
W
L
L
|
|
| 4 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 22:18 | 4 | 25 |
L
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 5 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 25:32 | -7 | 22 |
W
D
W
W
L
|
|
| 6 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 24:23 | 1 | 21 |
W
W
L
D
L
|
|
| 7 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 36:37 | -1 | 20 |
W
D
L
D
W
|
|
| 8 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 25:21 | 4 | 19 |
L
D
W
W
L
|
|
| 9 | 15 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 21:25 | -4 | 18 |
D
D
L
D
W
|
|
| 10 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 21:23 | -2 | 16 |
W
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 11 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 22:31 | -9 | 14 |
D
L
D
W
L
|
|
| 12 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 23:44 | -21 | 14 |
L
D
W
L
W
|
|
| 13 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 22:29 | -7 | 14 |
L
L
L
D
L
|
|
| 14 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 14:23 | -9 | 11 |
L
D
L
W
W
|
|
| 15 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 18:30 | -12 | 7 |
L
D
L
L
D
|