Ceramica Cleopatra vs Petrojet H2H Stats
Compare football head-to-head records, previous meetings, wins, draws, BTTS and Over 2.5 trends before reading the match prediction.
View today's football H2H statsCeramica Cleopatra vs Petrojet Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | No Draw |
95.3%
|
1.36 | |
| BTTS | Yes |
82.5%
|
1.91 | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
77.2%
|
2.16 | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
92%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
3.10 | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
23.00 |
Ceramica Cleopatra
Petrojet
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Ceramica Cleopatra
6 matches
Petrojet
6 matches
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Statistic | Petrojet |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Wins | 2 |
| 0 | Draws | 2 |
| 2 | Losses | 2 |
| 11 | Goals For | 10 |
| 7 | Goals Against | 10 |
| 1.83 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.67 |
| 1.17 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.67 |
| 3 | BTTS Yes | 6 |
| 6 | Over 1.5 | 6 |
| 3 | Over 2.5 | 5 |
| 2 | Over 3.5 | 2 |
| 3 | Clean Sheets | 0 |
| 0 | Failed To Score | 0 |
| 5.17 | Shots On Goal | 5.33 |
| 10.83 | Total Shots | 18.67 |
| 4.5 | Corners | 8.33 |
| 59.3% | Ball Possession | 50.8% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This match appears to feature a noticeable gap in profile, built around Ceramica Cleopatra's more proactive style and Petrojet's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Ceramica Cleopatra arrive from the stronger league position, sitting 6 with 12 points compared to Petrojet in 9 on 8, which underlines the gap in season consistency. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Ceramica Cleopatra come in with stronger recent momentum, which could help them control the rhythm for longer periods. Given the broader gap between the sides, Away Win looks like the most logical direction, while the clean-sheet expectation leans toward Petrojet. The shape dynamic also adds another layer here, with Ceramica Cleopatra expected to line up in 4-2-3-1 and Petrojet in 4-4-2, which may reinforce the expected flow toward Petrojet having the stronger overall control. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected.
Ceramica Cleopatra are currently 6 in the standings with 12 points from 6 matches. Across the campaign, they have posted 4 wins, 0 draws, and 2 losses, while the 11:7 goal ratio supports the view of very strong form with results showing strong momentum. Going forward they rely heavily on Mohamed Reda (2 goals), Ahmed Belhadji (2 goals), Amr Kalawa (1 goals), with creative support from Mohamed Reda (2 assists), Ahmed Belhadji (2 assists), Amr Kalawa (1 assists), and defensively they have been very solid. At home, the record of 2 wins, 0 draws, and 1 losses points toward a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their broader style still suggests balanced attacking football.
From their first 6 matches, Petrojet have collected 8 points and now occupy 9 place in the table. Across the campaign, they have posted 2 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses, while the 10:10 goal ratio supports the view of mixed form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on Mostafa El Badry (3 goals), Ahmed Bahbah (2 goals), Badr Moussa (1 goals), with creative support from Mostafa El Badry (1 assists), Ahmed Bahbah (1 assists), Badr Moussa (1 assists), and defensively they have been very solid. Away from home, their split return of 1 wins, 1 draws, and 1 losses fits a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they usually display a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 5 head-to-head meetings, Ceramica Cleopatra won 4 times, Petrojet won 1 times, while 0 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 12:4 from Ceramica Cleopatra's perspective. 3 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 3 matches, with an average of 3.2 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13:2 | 11 | 18 |
W
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11:3 | 8 | 16 |
W
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 3 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8:3 | 5 | 13 |
L
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10:6 | 4 | 13 |
W
W
W
L
W
|
|
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8:4 | 4 | 13 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 6 |
Ceramica Cleopatra
Home
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11:7 | 4 | 12 |
L
W
W
W
W
|
| 7 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7:7 | 0 | 9 |
W
L
W
W
L
|
|
| 8 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:6 | 1 | 8 |
D
W
D
W
L
|
|
| 9 |
Petrojet
Away
|
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10:10 | 0 | 8 |
D
W
W
L
L
|
| 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5:6 | -1 | 8 |
D
W
L
W
L
|
|
| 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6:6 | 0 | 7 |
D
L
D
D
D
|
|
| 12 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6:8 | -2 | 7 |
D
L
L
L
W
|
|
| 13 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2:4 | -2 | 7 |
W
W
L
L
D
|
|
| 14 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5:8 | -3 | 7 |
L
L
D
L
W
|
|
| 15 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6:7 | -1 | 6 |
D
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 16 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3:6 | -3 | 5 |
W
L
L
L
D
|
|
| 17 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8:12 | -4 | 4 |
L
L
W
D
L
|
|
| 18 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2:10 | -8 | 3 |
L
L
L
L
L
|
|
| 19 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4:8 | -4 | 2 |
L
L
L
L
D
|
|
| 20 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1:10 | -9 | 1 |
L
L
L
D
L
|