Niva vs FC Slutsk Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
56.2%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
67.1%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
72%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
Niva
FC Slutsk
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Niva
20 matches
FC Slutsk
23 matches
| Niva | Statistic | FC Slutsk |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Wins | 13 |
| 4 | Draws | 6 |
| 5 | Losses | 4 |
| 42 | Goals For | 41 |
| 28 | Goals Against | 28 |
| 2.1 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.78 |
| 1.4 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.22 |
| 13 | BTTS Yes | 16 |
| 18 | Over 1.5 | 21 |
| 15 | Over 2.5 | 13 |
| 9 | Over 3.5 | 8 |
| 5 | Clean Sheets | 5 |
| 2 | Failed To Score | 2 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
Looking at the broader profile of both teams, this encounter highlights two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward FC Slutsk. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward FC Slutsk having the stronger overall control. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Niva come in with stronger recent momentum, which could help them control the rhythm for longer periods.
Niva come into this fixture from a strong position, holding 3 place with 30 points after 16 matches. The return of 9 wins, 3 draws, and 4 defeats, together with goals at 37:18, reflects very strong form with results showing strong momentum. Much of their attacking edge comes through their main attacking players, while their defending has remained very solid. At home, their record of 5 wins, 2 draws, and 1 losses points to a very strong split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Their overall playing style can be described as balanced attacking football.
Placed 1 with 36 points from 16 outings, FC Slutsk continue to operate from a strong competitive position. Across the campaign, they have posted 11 wins, 3 draws, and 2 losses, while the 34:18 goal ratio supports the view of mixed form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been very solid. Away from home, their split return of 5 wins, 1 draws, and 2 losses fits a fairly balanced split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Stylistically, they usually display balanced attacking football.
Across those 4 head-to-head meetings, Niva won 1 times, FC Slutsk won 3 times, while 0 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 3:7 from Niva's perspective. 2 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 2 matches, with an average of 2.5 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Niva
Home
|
24 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 63:30 | 33 | 51 |
W
W
W
L
W
|
| 2 |
FC Slutsk
Away
|
24 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 45:24 | 21 | 48 |
W
D
W
D
D
|
| 3 | 24 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 47:38 | 9 | 48 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 4 | 24 | 13 | 5 | 6 | 45:29 | 16 | 44 |
L
W
W
L
W
|
|
| 5 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 41:34 | 7 | 42 |
D
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 6 | 24 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 45:30 | 15 | 40 |
D
W
L
W
L
|
|
| 7 | 24 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 43:37 | 6 | 34 |
L
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 8 | 24 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 39:41 | -2 | 34 |
L
W
L
L
L
|
|
| 9 | 24 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 46:43 | 3 | 33 |
W
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 10 | 24 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 33:34 | -1 | 33 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 11 | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 41:37 | 4 | 32 |
D
L
W
W
L
|
|
| 12 | 24 | 9 | 2 | 13 | 35:45 | -10 | 29 |
L
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 13 | 24 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 29:34 | -5 | 27 |
W
D
L
L
W
|
|
| 14 | 24 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 27:43 | -16 | 26 |
D
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 15 | 24 | 6 | 7 | 11 | 24:33 | -9 | 25 |
L
D
L
W
D
|
|
| 16 | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 33:47 | -14 | 21 |
L
L
D
L
L
|
|
| 17 | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 34:55 | -21 | 21 |
W
L
D
W
W
|
|
| 18 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 17 | 25:61 | -36 | 17 |
L
L
L
W
D
|