Niva vs Smorgon Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | No Draw |
85.1%
|
- | |
| BTTS | BTTS No |
26%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
30.4%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-0 |
-
|
- |
Niva
Smorgon
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Niva
10 matches
Smorgon
11 matches
| Niva | Statistic | Smorgon |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Wins | 2 |
| 2 | Draws | 4 |
| 4 | Losses | 5 |
| 16 | Goals For | 9 |
| 21 | Goals Against | 17 |
| 1.6 | Avg Goals Scored | 0.82 |
| 2.1 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.55 |
| 8 | BTTS Yes | 5 |
| 9 | Over 1.5 | 7 |
| 8 | Over 2.5 | 4 |
| 5 | Over 3.5 | 3 |
| 1 | Clean Sheets | 3 |
| 1 | Failed To Score | 5 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From the opening view, this looks like a meeting between teams arriving with different levels of stability, reinforced by Niva's more proactive style and Smorgon's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward Smorgon. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Smorgon having the stronger overall control. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Niva arrive from the stronger league position, sitting 9 with 10 points compared to Smorgon in 17 on 3, which underlines the gap in season consistency. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. Smorgon arrive with more visible recent inconsistency, which may leave them vulnerable if the match starts badly.
So far, Niva have built a campaign that leaves them 9 in the table on 10 points from 7 matches. Across the campaign, they have posted 3 wins, 1 draws, and 3 losses, while the 13:12 goal ratio supports the view of good form and are on a winning streak. Going forward they rely heavily on D. Fedortsov (5 goals), P. Pampukha (3 goals), I. Monich (2 goals), with creative support from D. Fedortsov (2 assists), D. Galuza (2 assists), I. Monich (1 assists), and defensively they have been very solid. At home, their split return of 1 wins, 1 draws, and 1 losses fits a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they usually display balanced attacking football.
With 3 points from 7 games and a place of 17, Smorgon still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. Across the season they have posted 0 wins, 3 draws, and 4 defeats, and the 3:11 goal record continues to suggest poor form over their recent run. Their attacking burden often falls on A. Devyaten (1 goals), V. Kovalevich (1 goals), V. Myzgin (1 goals), with creative support from M. Dukso (1 assists), while at the back they have been very solid. Away from home, the split record of 0 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses points to a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are under visible pressure near the relegation zone. Their broader football approach still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 1 head-to-head meetings, Niva won 1 times, Smorgon won 0 times, while 0 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 3:0 from Niva's perspective. 1 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 0 matches, with an average of 3 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Niva
Home
|
25 | 16 | 3 | 6 | 63:31 | 32 | 51 |
L
W
W
W
L
|
| 2 | 25 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 48:24 | 24 | 51 |
W
W
D
W
D
|
|
| 3 | 26 | 16 | 3 | 7 | 49:43 | 6 | 51 |
W
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 25 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 48:30 | 18 | 47 |
W
L
W
W
L
|
|
| 5 | 26 | 14 | 4 | 8 | 48:31 | 17 | 46 |
W
W
D
W
L
|
|
| 6 | 25 | 14 | 3 | 8 | 44:36 | 8 | 45 |
W
D
W
W
W
|
|
| 7 | 25 | 11 | 4 | 10 | 47:37 | 10 | 37 |
W
L
L
L
W
|
|
| 8 | 25 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 49:43 | 6 | 36 |
W
W
D
L
L
|
|
| 9 | 25 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 42:37 | 5 | 35 |
W
D
L
W
W
|
|
| 10 | 25 | 10 | 4 | 11 | 40:44 | -4 | 34 |
L
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 11 | 25 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 35:37 | -2 | 33 |
L
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 12 |
Smorgon
Away
|
26 | 8 | 6 | 12 | 31:36 | -5 | 30 |
L
W
W
D
L
|
| 13 | 25 | 9 | 3 | 13 | 36:46 | -10 | 30 |
D
L
L
L
D
|
|
| 14 | 25 | 7 | 5 | 13 | 27:46 | -19 | 26 |
L
D
L
W
L
|
|
| 15 | 25 | 6 | 7 | 12 | 24:34 | -10 | 25 |
L
L
D
L
W
|
|
| 16 | 25 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 33:48 | -15 | 21 |
L
L
L
D
L
|
|
| 17 | 26 | 5 | 6 | 15 | 35:60 | -25 | 21 |
L
L
W
L
D
|
|
| 18 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 17 | 26:62 | -36 | 18 |
D
L
L
L
W
|