Niva vs Bumprom Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
71.1%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
88%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
88%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Under 11.5 Corners |
92%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
Niva
Bumprom
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Niva
26 matches
Bumprom
27 matches
| Niva | Statistic | Bumprom |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Wins | 11 |
| 4 | Draws | 4 |
| 6 | Losses | 12 |
| 64 | Goals For | 47 |
| 38 | Goals Against | 42 |
| 2.46 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.74 |
| 1.46 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.56 |
| 18 | BTTS Yes | 20 |
| 24 | Over 1.5 | 23 |
| 21 | Over 2.5 | 18 |
| 13 | Over 3.5 | 11 |
| 6 | Clean Sheets | 4 |
| 2 | Failed To Score | 4 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From a tactical perspective, this fixture features two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Bumprom having the stronger overall control. Niva come in with stronger recent momentum, which could help them control the rhythm for longer periods. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors Bumprom. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. The attacking numbers of both teams point toward a more open scoring environment.This game has the potential to be open, with both sides capable of creating several scoring chances. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent.
Niva approach this game with the confidence of a side sitting 1 on 48 points after 23 outings. With 15 wins, 3 draws, and 5 defeats plus a goal balance of 61:29, they continue to show very strong form with results showing strong momentum. Their attacking quality is driven by their main attacking players, and at the back they have appeared fairly stable. At home, they have managed 8 wins, 2 draws, and 1 losses, which underlines a very strong split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. In stylistic terms they continue to show balanced attacking football.
Bumprom sit 7 with 34 points after 22 league matches. The record of 10 wins, 4 draws, and 8 defeats, together with a 41:33 goal balance, points toward good form over their recent run. Much of their attacking threat comes through their main attacking players, while at the back they have looked fairly stable. Away from home, their split return of 5 wins, 3 draws, and 3 losses fits a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Stylistically, they usually display balanced attacking football.
Across those 7 head-to-head meetings, Niva won 1 times, Bumprom won 3 times, while 3 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 9:16 from Niva's perspective. 5 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 4 matches, with an average of 3.57 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Niva
Home
|
24 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 63:30 | 33 | 51 |
W
W
W
L
W
|
| 2 | 24 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 45:24 | 21 | 48 |
W
D
W
D
D
|
|
| 3 | 24 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 47:38 | 9 | 48 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 4 | 24 | 13 | 5 | 6 | 45:29 | 16 | 44 |
L
W
W
L
W
|
|
| 5 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 41:34 | 7 | 42 |
D
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 6 | 24 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 45:30 | 15 | 40 |
D
W
L
W
L
|
|
| 7 |
Bumprom
Away
|
24 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 43:37 | 6 | 34 |
L
L
L
W
W
|
| 8 | 24 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 39:41 | -2 | 34 |
L
W
L
L
L
|
|
| 9 | 24 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 46:43 | 3 | 33 |
W
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 10 | 24 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 33:34 | -1 | 33 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 11 | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 41:37 | 4 | 32 |
D
L
W
W
L
|
|
| 12 | 24 | 9 | 2 | 13 | 35:45 | -10 | 29 |
L
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 13 | 24 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 29:34 | -5 | 27 |
W
D
L
L
W
|
|
| 14 | 24 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 27:43 | -16 | 26 |
D
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 15 | 24 | 6 | 7 | 11 | 24:33 | -9 | 25 |
L
D
L
W
D
|
|
| 16 | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 33:47 | -14 | 21 |
L
L
D
L
L
|
|
| 17 | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 34:55 | -21 | 21 |
W
L
D
W
W
|
|
| 18 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 17 | 25:61 | -36 | 17 |
L
L
L
W
D
|