Predictions & Statistics
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
55%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
67.1%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
70.3%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
78.3%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
New England Revolution
Houston Dynamo
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
New England Revolution
22 matches
Houston Dynamo
26 matches
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Wins | 16 |
| 4 | Draws | 4 |
| 7 | Losses | 6 |
| 44 | Goals For | 46 |
| 28 | Goals Against | 34 |
| 2 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.77 |
| 1.27 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.31 |
| 14 | BTTS Yes | 14 |
| 17 | Over 1.5 | 21 |
| 15 | Over 2.5 | 13 |
| 8 | Over 3.5 | 7 |
| 5 | Clean Sheets | 8 |
| 4 | Failed To Score | 4 |
| 4.06 | Shots On Goal | 4.76 |
| 10.82 | Total Shots | 13.41 |
| 3.88 | Corners | 4.29 |
| 50.1% | Ball Possession | 45.5% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This contest looks finely balanced, with New England Revolution's more proactive style and Houston Dynamo's more cautious structure suggesting a close tactical battle. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward Houston Dynamo. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. The shape dynamic also adds another layer here, with New England Revolution expected to line up in 4-2-3-1 and Houston Dynamo in 4-1-4-1, which may reinforce the expected flow toward Houston Dynamo having the stronger overall control. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. There is little separation in the broader season picture, with both sides operating from relatively comparable league positions and points returns.
New England Revolution arrive from the upper part of the table, holding 3 place with 29 points after 16 matches. Their overall return of 9 wins, 2 draws, and 5 losses with goals at 26:19 reflects mixed form over their recent run. Their attacking weight is carried by Carles Gil (6 goals), Dor Turgeman (2 goals), Luca Langoni (2 goals), with creative support from Dor Turgeman (3 assists), Carles Gil (2 assists), Matt Polster (2 assists), while defensively they have appeared very solid. At home, they have returned 8 wins, 1 draws, and 1 losses, a split that suggests a very strong split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. In football terms, they tend to show balanced attacking football.
Placed 5 with 26 points from 16 outings, Houston Dynamo continue to operate from a strong competitive position. Their overall return of 8 wins, 2 draws, and 6 losses with goals at 23:24 reflects mixed form over their recent run. Their attacking weight is carried by Guilherme (5 goals), Mateusz Bogusz (3 goals), Lawrence Ennali (2 goals), with creative support from Guilherme (2 assists), Lawrence Ennali (2 assists), Jack McGlynn (1 assists), while defensively they have appeared very solid. Away from home, their split return of 2 wins, 1 draws, and 4 losses fits a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Stylistically, they usually display a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 15 head-to-head meetings, New England Revolution won 7 times, Houston Dynamo won 5 times, while 3 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 27:23 from New England Revolution's perspective. 10 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 9 matches, with an average of 3.33 goals per game.
New England Revolution
CF Montreal
New England Revolution
Atlanta United FC
New England Revolution
Toronto FC
New England Revolution
Charlotte
New England Revolution
Minnesota United FC
New England Revolution
Nashville SC
New England Revolution
Philadelphia Union
New England Revolution
Charlotte
New England Revolution
Inter Miami
New England Revolution
Atlanta United FC
New England Revolution
Columbus Crew
New England Revolution
DC United
New England Revolution
CF Montreal
New England Revolution
St. Louis City
New England Revolution
FC Cincinnati
New England Revolution
New York Red Bulls
New England Revolution
Nashville SC
New England Revolution
Hartford Athletic
New England Revolution
CF Montreal
New England Revolution
Houston Dynamo
Houston Dynamo
Sporting Kansas City
Houston Dynamo
Austin
Houston Dynamo
DC United
Houston Dynamo
America de Cali
Houston Dynamo
CD Olimpia
Houston Dynamo
Los Angeles Galaxy
Houston Dynamo
Vancouver Whitecaps
Houston Dynamo
Real Salt Lake
Houston Dynamo
Los Angeles FC
Houston Dynamo
Colorado Rapids
Houston Dynamo
Austin
Houston Dynamo
San Diego
Houston Dynamo
Orlando City SC
Houston Dynamo
Colorado Rapids
Houston Dynamo
Seattle Sounders
Houston Dynamo
FC Dallas
Houston Dynamo
Portland Timbers
Houston Dynamo
Los Angeles FC
Houston Dynamo
Chicago Fire
Houston Dynamo
New York Red Bulls
New England Revolution
Atlanta United FC
New England Revolution
Toronto FC
New England Revolution
Minnesota United FC
New England Revolution
Nashville SC
New England Revolution
Philadelphia Union
New England Revolution
Charlotte
New England Revolution
Columbus Crew
New England Revolution
DC United
New England Revolution
CF Montreal
New England Revolution
FC Cincinnati
New England Revolution
Hartford Athletic
New England Revolution
CF Montreal
New England Revolution
Houston Dynamo
New England Revolution
FC Cincinnati
New England Revolution
Sarasota Paradise
Houston Dynamo
Sporting Kansas City
Houston Dynamo
Los Angeles Galaxy
Houston Dynamo
Real Salt Lake
Houston Dynamo
Los Angeles FC
Houston Dynamo
Austin
Houston Dynamo
Orlando City SC
Houston Dynamo
Colorado Rapids
Houston Dynamo
FC Dallas
Houston Dynamo
FC Dallas
Houston Dynamo
New England Revolution
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 35:14 | 21 | 40 |
D
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 18 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 45:32 | 13 | 38 |
D
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 3 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 28:21 | 7 | 30 |
D
W
D
L
W
|
|
| 4 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 32:23 | 9 | 29 |
W
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 5 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 31:24 | 7 | 26 |
D
W
W
L
D
|
|
| 6 | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 45:44 | 1 | 26 |
W
L
W
W
D
|
|
| 7 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 29:27 | 2 | 25 |
L
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 8 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 29:39 | -10 | 25 |
W
L
L
W
D
|
|
| 9 | 18 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 26:29 | -3 | 23 |
D
W
D
D
D
|
|
| 10 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 10 | 30:47 | -17 | 20 |
L
W
W
L
D
|
|
| 11 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 26:28 | -2 | 20 |
D
W
L
W
D
|
|
| 12 | 18 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 24:32 | -8 | 17 |
D
L
D
D
L
|
|
| 13 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 25:33 | -8 | 16 |
W
W
W
L
D
|
|
| 14 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 24:35 | -11 | 16 |
D
L
L
D
D
|
|
| 15 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 19:33 | -14 | 12 |
L
L
D
L
L
|