NEOM vs Al Shabab Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | No Draw |
84.6%
|
- | |
| BTTS | BTTS Yes |
94.6%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
80.5%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
92%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
NEOM
Al Shabab
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
NEOM
31 matches
Al Shabab
31 matches
| NEOM | Statistic | Al Shabab |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Wins | 7 |
| 8 | Draws | 11 |
| 12 | Losses | 13 |
| 40 | Goals For | 40 |
| 44 | Goals Against | 52 |
| 1.29 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.29 |
| 1.42 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.68 |
| 20 | BTTS Yes | 19 |
| 22 | Over 1.5 | 24 |
| 17 | Over 2.5 | 13 |
| 9 | Over 3.5 | 12 |
| 6 | Clean Sheets | 7 |
| 6 | Failed To Score | 8 |
| 4.68 | Shots On Goal | 4.65 |
| 12.94 | Total Shots | 12.97 |
| 4.9 | Corners | 5.29 |
| 51.4% | Ball Possession | 48.1% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From a tactical perspective, this fixture features two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward Al Shabab. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. The shape dynamic also adds another layer here, with NEOM expected to line up in 4-4-2 and Al Shabab in 4-2-3-1, which may reinforce the expected flow toward Al Shabab having the stronger overall control. A relatively balanced game with moderate goal potential looks most likely.
From their first 31 matches, NEOM have collected 41 points and now occupy 8 place in the table. Across the campaign, they have posted 11 wins, 8 draws, and 12 losses, while the 40:44 goal ratio supports the view of mixed form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on A. Lacazette (11 goals), S. Benrahma (8 goals), L. Rodriguez (6 goals), with creative support from S. Benrahma (7 assists), A. Lacazette (4 assists), A. Doucoure (4 assists), and defensively they have been quite vulnerable. At home, they have returned 5 wins, 3 draws, and 7 losses, a split that suggests a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. In football terms, they tend to show a more cautious and defensive approach.
Al Shabab are currently 13 in the standings with 32 points from 31 matches. The record of 7 wins, 11 draws, and 13 defeats, together with a 40:52 goal balance, points toward poor form over their recent run. Much of their attacking threat comes through Y. Carrasco (16 goals), A. Hamdallah (6 goals), J. Brownhill (5 goals), with creative support from Y. Carrasco (5 assists), A. Hamdallah (2 assists), J. Brownhill (2 assists), while at the back they have looked quite vulnerable. Away from home, the record of 2 wins, 7 draws, and 6 losses points toward a weak split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Their broader style still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 2 head-to-head meetings, NEOM won 1 times, Al Shabab won 1 times, while 0 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 4:4 from NEOM's perspective. 2 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 2 matches, with an average of 4 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 28 | 2 | 4 | 91:28 | 63 | 86 |
W
D
W
L
W
|
|
| 2 | 34 | 25 | 9 | 0 | 85:27 | 58 | 84 |
W
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 3 | 34 | 25 | 6 | 3 | 71:25 | 46 | 81 |
W
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 34 | 23 | 8 | 3 | 83:34 | 49 | 77 |
W
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 5 | 34 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 55:48 | 7 | 55 |
L
L
W
W
D
|
|
| 6 | 34 | 15 | 8 | 11 | 59:46 | 13 | 53 |
L
D
L
W
L
|
|
| 7 | 34 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 51:55 | -4 | 50 |
D
L
W
D
W
|
|
| 8 |
NEOM
Home
|
34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 43:48 | -5 | 45 |
D
L
W
D
D
|
| 9 | 34 | 11 | 9 | 14 | 38:57 | -19 | 42 |
W
L
D
L
D
|
|
| 10 | 34 | 10 | 8 | 16 | 41:54 | -13 | 38 |
L
L
L
W
D
|
|
| 11 | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 41:55 | -14 | 37 |
D
W
L
L
D
|
|
| 12 | 34 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 54:62 | -8 | 37 |
L
L
L
L
W
|
|
| 13 |
Al Shabab
Away
|
34 | 8 | 11 | 15 | 44:57 | -13 | 35 |
L
W
L
L
L
|
| 14 | 34 | 9 | 6 | 19 | 39:61 | -22 | 33 |
D
L
D
D
D
|
|
| 15 | 34 | 7 | 9 | 18 | 35:63 | -28 | 30 |
W
D
W
L
L
|
|
| 16 | 34 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 32:55 | -23 | 29 |
L
W
L
L
L
|
|
| 17 | 34 | 5 | 5 | 24 | 27:70 | -43 | 20 |
L
W
D
L
L
|
|
| 18 | 34 | 3 | 7 | 24 | 32:76 | -44 | 16 |
W
L
D
D
L
|