Lund vs Olympic Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | No Draw |
87.1%
|
1.18 | |
| BTTS | Yes |
82.5%
|
1.53 | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
77.2%
|
1.47 | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
1.21 | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
2.62 | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
9.00 |
Lund
Olympic
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Lund
27 matches
Olympic
27 matches
| Lund | Statistic | Olympic |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Wins | 12 |
| 8 | Draws | 6 |
| 7 | Losses | 9 |
| 48 | Goals For | 44 |
| 35 | Goals Against | 41 |
| 1.78 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.63 |
| 1.3 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.52 |
| 16 | BTTS Yes | 20 |
| 21 | Over 1.5 | 24 |
| 16 | Over 2.5 | 17 |
| 11 | Over 3.5 | 10 |
| 9 | Clean Sheets | 4 |
| 5 | Failed To Score | 4 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
Looking at the broader profile of both teams, this encounter highlights Lund's more proactive style and Olympic's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward Olympic. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Olympic having the stronger overall control. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent.
Lund arrive from the upper part of the table, holding 5 place with 28 points after 17 matches. Across the campaign, they have posted 7 wins, 7 draws, and 3 losses, while the 29:22 goal ratio supports the view of poor form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been very solid. At home, they have returned 5 wins, 0 draws, and 2 losses, a split that suggests a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. In football terms, they tend to show balanced attacking football.
So far, Olympic have built a campaign that leaves them 9 in the table on 23 points from 17 matches. Across the campaign, they have posted 7 wins, 2 draws, and 8 losses, while the 27:29 goal ratio supports the view of good form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been fairly stable. Away from home, they have returned 2 wins, 1 draws, and 5 losses, a split that suggests a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. In football terms, they tend to show a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 12 head-to-head meetings, Lund won 6 times, Olympic won 2 times, while 4 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 26:18 from Lund's perspective. 11 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 12 matches, with an average of 3.67 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 44:24 | 20 | 42 |
W
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 2 | 21 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 41:26 | 15 | 39 |
L
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 3 | 21 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 45:32 | 13 | 39 |
W
D
L
W
W
|
|
| 4 |
Lund
Home
|
21 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 44:26 | 18 | 38 |
W
D
W
W
L
|
| 5 | 21 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 35:28 | 7 | 34 |
L
W
W
D
D
|
|
| 6 | 21 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 28:28 | 0 | 33 |
D
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 7 | 21 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 39:31 | 8 | 32 |
D
D
D
L
D
|
|
| 8 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 33:33 | 0 | 28 |
W
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 9 | 21 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 25:20 | 5 | 27 |
D
L
W
D
D
|
|
| 10 | 21 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 23:29 | -6 | 27 |
W
W
D
W
L
|
|
| 11 |
Olympic
Away
|
21 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 38:43 | -5 | 26 |
L
W
L
L
D
|
| 12 | 21 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 32:38 | -6 | 25 |
L
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 13 | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 25:33 | -8 | 21 |
D
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 14 | 21 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 28:38 | -10 | 21 |
W
L
D
L
D
|
|
| 15 | 21 | 3 | 8 | 10 | 25:39 | -14 | 17 |
L
L
L
L
L
|
|
| 16 | 21 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 17:54 | -37 | 8 |
L
D
L
D
D
|