Hull City vs Birmingham Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
71.7%
|
- | |
| BTTS | BTTS Yes |
74.6%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
61.1%
|
- |
Hull City
Birmingham
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Hull City
44 matches
Birmingham
44 matches
| Hull City | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Wins | 16 |
| 9 | Draws | 12 |
| 15 | Losses | 16 |
| 64 | Goals For | 55 |
| 64 | Goals Against | 55 |
| 1.45 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.25 |
| 1.45 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.25 |
| 26 | BTTS Yes | 24 |
| 33 | Over 1.5 | 34 |
| 28 | Over 2.5 | 20 |
| 17 | Over 3.5 | 9 |
| 12 | Clean Sheets | 10 |
| 10 | Failed To Score | 11 |
| 4.02 | Shots On Goal | 4.07 |
| 11.25 | Total Shots | 13.66 |
| 4.59 | Corners | 5.77 |
| 45.3% | Ball Possession | 54.1% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This match appears to feature a noticeable gap in profile, built around Hull City's more proactive style and Birmingham's more cautious structure. Hull City appear more affected by absences, and that imbalance in squad availability could shift some of the structural advantage toward Birmingham. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors Birmingham. Hull City arrive from the stronger league position, sitting 6 with 68 points compared to Birmingham in 15 on 56, which underlines the gap in season consistency. The attacking numbers of both teams point toward a more open scoring environment.This game has the potential to be open, with both sides capable of creating several scoring chances. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Birmingham arrive with more visible recent inconsistency, which may leave them vulnerable if the match starts badly. Both teams appear likely to operate from a similar base structure, so execution within the same shape could be more decisive than formation itself.
From their first 42 matches, Hull City have collected 68 points and now occupy 6 place in the table. The record of 20 wins, 8 draws, and 14 defeats, together with a 64:60 goal balance, points toward poor form over their recent run. Much of their attacking threat comes through Oliver McBurnie (14 goals), J. Gelhardt (13 goals), K. Joseph (8 goals), with creative support from R. Giles (8 assists), Oliver McBurnie (7 assists), K. Joseph (5 assists), while at the back they have looked quite vulnerable. At home, the record of 10 wins, 4 draws, and 7 losses points toward a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their broader style still suggests balanced attacking football. Although they are without A. Famewo, R. Giles, Y. Hirakawa, J. Lundstram, that could reduce some of their usual creative supply in attacking areas.
With 56 points from 42 games and a place of 15, Birmingham still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. The overall return of 15 wins, 11 draws, and 16 defeats with a 51:52 goal balance points toward poor form over their recent run. Going forward they depend heavily on M. Ducksch (10 goals), J. Stansfield (9 goals), D. Gray (5 goals), with creative support from J. Stansfield (6 assists), D. Gray (4 assists), P. Roberts (4 assists), while defensively they have looked quite vulnerable. Away from home, they have returned 5 wins, 3 draws, and 13 losses, which indicates a weak split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they tend to play with a more cautious and defensive approach. They are not at full strength, with L. Buchanan, A. Cochrane unavailable, although the overall attacking core still looks largely intact.
Across those 15 head-to-head meetings, Hull City won 6 times, Birmingham won 3 times, while 6 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 23:18 from Hull City's perspective. 6 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 7 matches, with an average of 2.73 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46 | 28 | 11 | 7 | 97:45 | 52 | 95 |
W
W
W
D
D
|
|
| 2 | 46 | 23 | 15 | 8 | 80:47 | 33 | 84 |
W
D
D
W
D
|
|
| 3 | 46 | 24 | 11 | 11 | 64:49 | 15 | 83 |
L
D
W
D
W
|
|
| 4 | 46 | 22 | 14 | 10 | 82:56 | 26 | 80 |
W
D
W
D
D
|
|
| 5 | 46 | 22 | 14 | 10 | 72:47 | 25 | 80 |
L
L
D
D
W
|
|
| 6 |
Hull City
Home
|
46 | 21 | 10 | 15 | 70:66 | 4 | 73 |
W
W
D
W
L
|
| 7 | 46 | 19 | 14 | 13 | 69:65 | 4 | 71 |
D
L
W
W
L
|
|
| 8 | 46 | 20 | 9 | 17 | 67:59 | 8 | 69 |
L
W
L
W
L
|
|
| 9 | 46 | 19 | 8 | 19 | 63:56 | 7 | 65 |
L
D
W
W
L
|
|
| 10 |
Birmingham
Away
|
46 | 17 | 13 | 16 | 57:56 | 1 | 64 |
D
W
W
D
W
|
| 11 | 46 | 18 | 10 | 18 | 57:59 | -2 | 64 |
W
D
W
L
W
|
|
| 12 | 46 | 17 | 11 | 18 | 59:59 | 0 | 62 |
W
L
D
L
D
|
|
| 13 | 46 | 18 | 6 | 22 | 66:66 | 0 | 60 |
W
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 14 | 46 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 55:62 | -7 | 60 |
L
W
L
L
W
|
|
| 15 | 46 | 16 | 10 | 20 | 61:73 | -12 | 58 |
L
L
L
L
D
|
|
| 16 | 46 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 53:65 | -12 | 57 |
L
L
L
L
L
|
|
| 17 | 46 | 15 | 10 | 21 | 51:56 | -5 | 55 |
L
L
L
L
D
|
|
| 18 | 46 | 14 | 13 | 19 | 49:64 | -15 | 55 |
D
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 19 | 46 | 13 | 14 | 19 | 44:58 | -14 | 53 |
L
W
L
D
L
|
|
| 20 | 46 | 13 | 13 | 20 | 42:56 | -14 | 52 |
L
W
D
L
D
|
|
| 21 | 46 | 13 | 14 | 19 | 48:58 | -10 | 51 |
L
D
W
W
D
|
|
| 22 | 46 | 11 | 14 | 21 | 45:59 | -14 | 47 |
L
W
L
L
W
|
|
| 23 | 46 | 12 | 16 | 18 | 58:68 | -10 | 46 |
W
D
D
L
L
|
|
| 24 | 46 | 2 | 12 | 32 | 29:89 | -60 | 0 |
W
L
L
D
D
|