Predictions & Statistics
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
53.9%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
86%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
82.2%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
FC jazz
OLS
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
FC jazz
19 matches
OLS
18 matches
| FC jazz | Statistic | OLS |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Wins | 8 |
| 4 | Draws | 5 |
| 8 | Losses | 5 |
| 27 | Goals For | 36 |
| 31 | Goals Against | 26 |
| 1.42 | Avg Goals Scored | 2 |
| 1.63 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.44 |
| 12 | BTTS Yes | 12 |
| 17 | Over 1.5 | 16 |
| 12 | Over 2.5 | 12 |
| 7 | Over 3.5 | 8 |
| 3 | Clean Sheets | 4 |
| 4 | Failed To Score | 2 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From a tactical perspective, this fixture features OLS's more proactive style and FC jazz's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward OLS having the stronger overall control. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors OLS. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected.
From their first 17 matches, FC jazz have collected 24 points and now occupy 8 place in the table. Across the campaign, they have posted 7 wins, 3 draws, and 7 losses, while the 24:25 goal ratio supports the view of mixed form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been very solid. At home, their split return of 2 wins, 2 draws, and 5 losses fits a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they usually display a more cautious and defensive approach.
Placed 3 with 26 points from 17 outings, OLS continue to operate from a strong competitive position. Across the campaign, they have posted 7 wins, 5 draws, and 5 losses, while the 32:24 goal ratio supports the view of poor form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been very solid. Away from home, the record of 2 wins, 4 draws, and 3 losses points toward a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Their broader style still suggests balanced attacking football.
Across those 7 head-to-head meetings, FC jazz won 3 times, OLS won 3 times, while 1 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 12:13 from FC jazz's perspective. 5 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 5 matches, with an average of 3.57 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 47:18 | 29 | 44 |
L
W
D
D
W
|
|
| 2 | 22 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 47:32 | 15 | 40 |
W
L
D
W
D
|
|
| 3 | 22 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 41:35 | 6 | 36 |
W
W
L
D
W
|
|
| 4 | 22 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 40:30 | 10 | 35 |
W
D
D
W
D
|
|
| 5 |
OLS
Away
|
22 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 43:35 | 8 | 34 |
W
L
D
D
W
|
| 6 |
FC jazz
Home
|
22 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 32:29 | 3 | 33 |
W
D
W
D
D
|
| 7 | 22 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 51:42 | 9 | 31 |
W
D
D
D
L
|
|
| 8 | 22 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 38:31 | 7 | 31 |
L
D
D
W
D
|
|
| 9 | 22 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 30:40 | -10 | 24 |
L
W
D
D
L
|
|
| 10 | 22 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 32:51 | -19 | 20 |
L
L
L
L
W
|
|
| 11 | 22 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 37:51 | -14 | 15 |
L
W
D
L
L
|
|
| 12 | 22 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 24:68 | -44 | 15 |
L
L
W
L
L
|