Bokelj vs Otrant-Olympic Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
53.1%
|
2.99 | |
| BTTS | No |
50.8%
|
1.72 | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
58.5%
|
1.51 | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
1.73 | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
4.50 | |
| Correct Score | 1-0 |
-
|
7.50 |
Bokelj
Otrant-Olympic
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Bokelj
12 matches
Otrant-Olympic
11 matches
| Bokelj | Statistic | Otrant-Olympic |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Wins | 5 |
| 2 | Draws | 2 |
| 5 | Losses | 4 |
| 7 | Goals For | 16 |
| 8 | Goals Against | 15 |
| 0.58 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.45 |
| 0.67 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.36 |
| 1 | BTTS Yes | 7 |
| 3 | Over 1.5 | 9 |
| 1 | Over 2.5 | 7 |
| 1 | Over 3.5 | 3 |
| 6 | Clean Sheets | 2 |
| 7 | Failed To Score | 3 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This contest looks finely balanced, with Bokelj's more proactive style and Otrant-Olympic's more cautious structure suggesting a close tactical battle. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Otrant-Olympic having the stronger overall control. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors Otrant-Olympic. There is little separation in the broader season picture, with both sides operating from relatively comparable league positions and points returns.
Placed 3 with 8 points from 5 outings, Bokelj continue to operate from a strong competitive position. Across the campaign, they have posted 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 losses, while the 2:1 goal ratio supports the view of mixed form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been very solid. At home, they have returned 1 wins, 1 draws, and 0 losses, a split that suggests a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. In football terms, they tend to show balanced attacking football.
Otrant-Olympic come into this match from a strong league position, sitting 4 with 7 points from 5 matches. The record of 2 wins, 1 draws, and 2 defeats, together with a 7:7 goal balance, points toward mixed form over their recent run. Much of their attacking threat comes through their main attacking players, while at the back they have looked very solid. Away from home, their split return of 2 wins, 0 draws, and 1 losses fits a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Stylistically, they usually display a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 14 head-to-head meetings, Bokelj won 8 times, Otrant-Olympic won 2 times, while 4 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 22:16 from Bokelj's perspective. 7 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 9 matches, with an average of 2.71 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Otrant-Olympic
Away
|
9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 15:10 | 5 | 16 |
W
W
L
W
W
|
| 2 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 10:7 | 3 | 15 |
D
L
D
L
W
|
|
| 3 |
Bokelj
Home
|
9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 8:5 | 3 | 15 |
W
D
W
L
D
|
| 4 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 11:7 | 4 | 14 |
W
W
W
L
D
|
|
| 5 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 11:7 | 4 | 14 |
W
W
W
D
W
|
|
| 6 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9:7 | 2 | 13 |
D
L
L
W
D
|
|
| 7 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 8:15 | -7 | 10 |
L
L
W
W
L
|
|
| 8 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9:15 | -6 | 9 |
L
D
L
W
L
|
|
| 9 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 7:9 | -2 | 8 |
L
L
D
D
D
|
|
| 10 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 5:11 | -6 | 7 |
L
W
L
L
L
|