Sardarapat vs FC Noah H2H Stats
Compare football head-to-head records, previous meetings, wins, draws, BTTS and Over 2.5 trends before reading the match prediction.
View today's football H2H statsSardarapat vs FC Noah Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Away Win |
63.7%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
71.2%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
72%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Draw / Away |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 1-2 |
-
|
- |
Sardarapat
FC Noah
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Sardarapat
12 matches
FC Noah
24 matches
| Sardarapat | Statistic | FC Noah |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Wins | 13 |
| 6 | Draws | 7 |
| 3 | Losses | 4 |
| 17 | Goals For | 43 |
| 19 | Goals Against | 27 |
| 1.42 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.79 |
| 1.58 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.13 |
| 10 | BTTS Yes | 10 |
| 11 | Over 1.5 | 20 |
| 5 | Over 2.5 | 11 |
| 4 | Over 3.5 | 6 |
| 1 | Clean Sheets | 11 |
| 2 | Failed To Score | 4 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 1.75 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 4.75 |
| 0 | Corners | 1 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 25% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This match appears to feature a noticeable gap in profile, built around two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors FC Noah. FC Noah carry the stronger overall league profile, standing 1 with 24 points while Sardarapat sit 5 on 12, suggesting a clearer edge in long-term output. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward FC Noah having the stronger overall control. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. FC Noah look sharper on recent form, and that momentum could be important in key phases of the match.
Placed 5 with 12 points from 8 outings, Sardarapat continue to operate from a strong competitive position. Their overall return of 3 wins, 3 draws, and 2 losses with goals at 14:12 reflects poor form over their recent run. Their attacking weight is carried by their main attacking players, while defensively they have appeared very solid. At home, they have returned 1 wins, 1 draws, and 1 losses, a split that suggests a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. In football terms, they tend to show balanced attacking football.
Operating from 1 place with 24 points from 8 games, FC Noah bring one of the stronger season profiles into this match. They have recorded 8 wins, 0 draws, and 0 losses, with a 21:5 goal return and very strong form and are on a winning streak. In attack they lean heavily on their main attacking players, while defensively they have looked very solid. Away from home, their record of 3 wins, 0 draws, and 0 losses points to a fairly balanced split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Their overall playing style can be described as balanced attacking football.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
FC Noah
Away
|
12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 31:10 | 21 | 31 |
W
L
D
W
W
|
| 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 31:9 | 22 | 31 |
W
W
W
D
W
|
|
| 3 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 24:10 | 14 | 29 |
W
W
W
D
W
|
|
| 4 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 27:8 | 19 | 25 |
W
W
W
D
D
|
|
| 5 |
Sardarapat
Home
|
12 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 19:20 | -1 | 17 |
D
D
W
L
D
|
| 6 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 19:15 | 4 | 16 |
L
D
W
D
W
|
|
| 7 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 14:15 | -1 | 14 |
W
L
D
L
L
|
|
| 8 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 12:32 | -20 | 11 |
L
D
W
L
W
|
|
| 9 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 10:20 | -10 | 11 |
L
L
D
D
W
|
|
| 10 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 11:26 | -15 | 8 |
L
W
L
W
L
|
|
| 11 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10:22 | -12 | 8 |
L
L
L
L
D
|
|
| 12 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 9:30 | -21 | 3 |
L
L
L
L
L
|