Quilmes vs Agropecuario H2H Stats
Compare football head-to-head records, previous meetings, wins, draws, BTTS and Over 2.5 trends before reading the match prediction.
View today's football H2H statsQuilmes vs Agropecuario Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
79.1%
|
1.83 | |
| BTTS | No |
88%
|
1.62 | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
72.8%
|
1.60 | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
1.36 | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
2.88 | |
| Correct Score | 2-0 |
-
|
7.50 |
Quilmes
Agropecuario
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Quilmes
32 matches
Agropecuario
33 matches
| Quilmes | Statistic | Agropecuario |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Wins | 9 |
| 9 | Draws | 10 |
| 13 | Losses | 14 |
| 30 | Goals For | 26 |
| 27 | Goals Against | 37 |
| 0.94 | Avg Goals Scored | 0.79 |
| 0.84 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.12 |
| 7 | BTTS Yes | 11 |
| 14 | Over 1.5 | 23 |
| 10 | Over 2.5 | 9 |
| 3 | Over 3.5 | 2 |
| 14 | Clean Sheets | 12 |
| 17 | Failed To Score | 16 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This contest looks finely balanced, with Quilmes's more proactive style and Agropecuario's more cautious structure suggesting a close tactical battle. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. A relatively balanced game with moderate goal potential looks most likely. There is little separation in the broader season picture, with both sides operating from relatively comparable league positions and points returns. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Agropecuario having the stronger overall control. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring Agropecuario.
So far, Quilmes have built a campaign that leaves them 12 in the table on 39 points from 32 matches. Across the campaign, they have posted 10 wins, 9 draws, and 13 losses, while the 30:27 goal ratio supports the view of mixed form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been fairly stable. At home, the record of 9 wins, 4 draws, and 3 losses points toward a very strong split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Their broader style still suggests balanced attacking football.
Agropecuario approach this match from a more delicate league position, standing 14 with 37 points from 32 matches. Their record of 9 wins, 10 draws, and 13 losses, together with goals at 26:35, reflects mixed form over their recent run. Much of their threat comes through their main attacking players, while the defensive numbers suggest they have been fairly stable. Away from home, the split record of 1 wins, 5 draws, and 10 losses points to a weak split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Their broader football approach still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 9 head-to-head meetings, Quilmes won 2 times, Agropecuario won 2 times, while 5 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 6:7 from Quilmes's perspective. 1 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 4 matches, with an average of 1.44 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33 | 15 | 14 | 4 | 32:15 | 17 | 59 |
D
D
W
D
D
|
|
| 2 | 33 | 16 | 11 | 6 | 40:27 | 13 | 59 |
W
W
L
W
D
|
|
| 3 | 33 | 18 | 4 | 11 | 39:30 | 9 | 58 |
W
W
W
D
W
|
|
| 4 | 33 | 15 | 10 | 8 | 50:42 | 8 | 55 |
D
L
D
D
W
|
|
| 5 | 33 | 14 | 9 | 10 | 38:26 | 12 | 51 |
W
D
L
W
W
|
|
| 6 | 33 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 34:30 | 4 | 49 |
D
L
W
L
D
|
|
| 7 | 33 | 13 | 9 | 11 | 40:32 | 8 | 48 |
D
W
W
D
D
|
|
| 8 | 33 | 13 | 8 | 12 | 32:31 | 1 | 47 |
D
W
W
L
W
|
|
| 9 | 33 | 12 | 10 | 11 | 35:33 | 2 | 46 |
D
L
L
W
D
|
|
| 10 | 33 | 10 | 13 | 10 | 35:33 | 2 | 43 |
L
W
D
L
W
|
|
| 11 | 33 | 11 | 9 | 13 | 27:34 | -7 | 42 |
L
L
L
W
L
|
|
| 12 | 33 | 11 | 8 | 14 | 30:39 | -9 | 41 |
W
W
L
L
D
|
|
| 13 |
Agropecuario
Away
|
33 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 27:35 | -8 | 40 |
W
D
L
W
L
|
| 14 |
Quilmes
Home
|
33 | 10 | 9 | 14 | 30:28 | 2 | 39 |
L
D
W
L
W
|
| 15 | 33 | 7 | 16 | 10 | 29:32 | -3 | 37 |
W
L
W
D
D
|
|
| 16 | 33 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 24:32 | -8 | 36 |
L
L
W
D
L
|
|
| 17 | 33 | 9 | 6 | 18 | 25:35 | -10 | 33 |
L
W
L
W
L
|
|
| 18 | 33 | 5 | 8 | 20 | 23:56 | -33 | 23 |
L
L
L
L
L
|