Predictions & Statistics
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
69.2%
|
- | |
| BTTS | BTTS No |
33.5%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
36.8%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
89.1%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-0 |
-
|
- |
Pyramids FC
Smouha SC
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Pyramids FC
25 matches
Smouha SC
25 matches
| Pyramids FC | Statistic | Smouha SC |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Wins | 8 |
| 6 | Draws | 7 |
| 4 | Losses | 10 |
| 41 | Goals For | 22 |
| 20 | Goals Against | 21 |
| 1.64 | Avg Goals Scored | 0.88 |
| 0.8 | Avg Goals Conceded | 0.84 |
| 13 | BTTS Yes | 9 |
| 18 | Over 1.5 | 14 |
| 12 | Over 2.5 | 6 |
| 6 | Over 3.5 | 1 |
| 10 | Clean Sheets | 7 |
| 3 | Failed To Score | 12 |
| 4.8 | Shots On Goal | 3.24 |
| 13.28 | Total Shots | 10 |
| 5.64 | Corners | 3.68 |
| 57% | Ball Possession | 44.4% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This match appears to feature a noticeable gap in profile, built around Pyramids FC's more proactive style and Smouha SC's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. The shape dynamic also adds another layer here, with Pyramids FC expected to line up in 4-2-3-1 and Smouha SC in 4-1-4-1, which may reinforce the expected flow toward Smouha SC having the stronger overall control. Pyramids FC arrive from the stronger league position, sitting 2 with 51 points compared to Smouha SC in 7 on 31, which underlines the gap in season consistency. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. Given the broader gap between the sides, Away Win looks like the most logical direction, while the clean-sheet expectation leans toward Smouha SC. Smouha SC arrive with more visible recent inconsistency, which may leave them vulnerable if the match starts badly. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent.
Pyramids FC come into this match from a strong league position, sitting 2 with 51 points from 5 matches. Their overall return of 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 losses with goals at 8:5 reflects mixed form over their recent run. Their attacking weight is carried by M. Ziko (6 goals), F. Mayele (5 goals), M. Hamdi (4 goals), with creative support from Mohamed Chibi (6 assists), Abdel Rahman Magdi (4 assists), M. Hamdi (3 assists), while defensively they have appeared very solid. At home, their split return of 2 wins, 1 draws, and 0 losses fits a fairly balanced split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Stylistically, they usually display balanced attacking football.
With 31 points from 5 games and a place of 7, Smouha SC still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. Their record of 0 wins, 0 draws, and 5 losses, together with goals at 1:8, reflects poor form and are going through a difficult losing run. Much of their threat comes through Pape Badji (5 goals), Samuel Amadi (5 goals), K. El Ghandour (3 goals), with creative support from K. El Ghandour (5 assists), H. Ashraf (2 assists), A. El Sisi (2 assists), while the defensive numbers suggest they have been very solid. Away from home, the split record of 0 wins, 0 draws, and 1 losses points to a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their broader football approach still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 15 head-to-head meetings, Pyramids FC won 11 times, Smouha SC won 2 times, while 2 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 34:15 from Pyramids FC's perspective. 11 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 9 matches, with an average of 3.27 goals per game.
Pyramids FC
3
2
15
3
4
3
Lineups
Pyramids FC
Ceramica Cleopatra
Pyramids FC
Enppi
Pyramids FC
Al Ahly
Pyramids FC
Zamalek SC
Pyramids FC
AL Masry
Pyramids FC
National Bank of Egypt
Pyramids FC
Haras El Hodood
Pyramids FC
Zamalek SC
Pyramids FC
Ghazl El Mehalla
Pyramids FC
Ceramica Cleopatra
Pyramids FC
Enppi
Pyramids FC
Smouha SC
Pyramids FC
El Gouna FC
Pyramids FC
Petrojet
Pyramids FC
Kahraba Ismailia
Pyramids FC
El Mokawloon
Pyramids FC
Al Ittihad
Pyramids FC
Pharco
Pyramids FC
El Geish
Pyramids FC
Masr
Smouha SC
Zamalek SC
Smouha SC
AL Masry
Smouha SC
Ceramica Cleopatra
Smouha SC
Al Ahly
Smouha SC
Enppi
Smouha SC
Future FC
Smouha SC
National Bank of Egypt
Smouha SC
Al Ahly
Smouha SC
Al Ittihad
Smouha SC
Zamalek SC
Smouha SC
Pyramids FC
Smouha SC
Enppi
Smouha SC
Pharco
Smouha SC
El Mokawloon
Smouha SC
El Gouna FC
Smouha SC
AL Masry
Smouha SC
Ismaily SC
Smouha SC
Wadi Degla
Smouha SC
Haras El Hodood
Smouha SC
Ceramica Cleopatra
Pyramids FC
Enppi
Pyramids FC
Al Ahly
Pyramids FC
AL Masry
Pyramids FC
Zamalek SC
Pyramids FC
Ceramica Cleopatra
Pyramids FC
El Gouna FC
Pyramids FC
El Mokawloon
Pyramids FC
Al Ittihad
Pyramids FC
Pharco
Pyramids FC
El Geish
Pyramids FC
Masr
Pyramids FC
Future FC
Pyramids FC
Ismaily SC
Smouha SC
Al Ahly
Smouha SC
National Bank of Egypt
Smouha SC
Al Ittihad
Smouha SC
Zamalek SC
Smouha SC
Enppi
Smouha SC
El Mokawloon
Smouha SC
AL Masry
Smouha SC
Wadi Degla
Smouha SC
Ceramica Cleopatra
Smouha SC
Kahraba Ismailia
Smouha SC
Ghazl El Mehalla
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 32:13 | 19 | 43 |
L
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 |
Pyramids FC
Home
|
20 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 33:15 | 18 | 43 |
W
W
L
W
W
|
| 3 | 20 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 33:19 | 14 | 40 |
L
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 20 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 29:16 | 13 | 38 |
D
D
D
L
W
|
|
| 5 | 20 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 29:20 | 9 | 32 |
L
W
L
W
D
|
|
| 6 |
Smouha SC
Away
|
20 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 21:13 | 8 | 31 |
W
W
L
L
L
|
| 7 | 20 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 20:16 | 4 | 30 |
W
W
W
L
D
|
|
| 8 | 20 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 23:20 | 3 | 29 |
D
D
W
D
L
|
|
| 9 | 20 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 21:16 | 5 | 29 |
W
D
L
D
D
|
|
| 10 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 16:15 | 1 | 28 |
W
D
W
D
L
|
|
| 11 | 20 | 5 | 11 | 4 | 18:14 | 4 | 26 |
L
D
L
W
D
|
|
| 12 | 20 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 21:23 | -2 | 25 |
L
D
W
D
D
|
|
| 13 | 20 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 18:24 | -6 | 23 |
L
L
D
L
D
|
|
| 14 | 20 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 14:24 | -10 | 22 |
W
W
W
D
L
|
|
| 15 | 20 | 6 | 2 | 12 | 15:24 | -9 | 20 |
L
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 16 | 20 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 12:15 | -3 | 19 |
D
L
L
D
L
|
|
| 17 | 20 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 13:21 | -8 | 18 |
L
D
D
W
L
|
|
| 18 | 20 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 15:29 | -14 | 17 |
L
L
W
L
D
|
|
| 19 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 22:37 | -15 | 16 |
L
W
D
D
L
|
|
| 20 | 20 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 8:22 | -14 | 15 |
D
L
L
D
D
|
|
| 21 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 11:28 | -17 | 11 |
L
L
D
L
L
|