Police vs KCCA H2H Stats
Compare football head-to-head records, previous meetings, wins, draws, BTTS and Over 2.5 trends before reading the match prediction.
View today's football H2H statsPolice vs KCCA Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Away or Draw |
68.4%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
71.2%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
72%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Draw / Away |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 1-2 |
-
|
- |
Police
KCCA
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Police
10 matches
KCCA
9 matches
| Police | Statistic | KCCA |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Wins | 6 |
| 3 | Draws | 1 |
| 3 | Losses | 2 |
| 10 | Goals For | 12 |
| 13 | Goals Against | 6 |
| 1 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.33 |
| 1.3 | Avg Goals Conceded | 0.67 |
| 4 | BTTS Yes | 2 |
| 6 | Over 1.5 | 6 |
| 4 | Over 2.5 | 3 |
| 2 | Over 3.5 | 1 |
| 4 | Clean Sheets | 5 |
| 4 | Failed To Score | 3 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From the opening view, this looks like a meeting between teams arriving with different levels of stability, reinforced by KCCA's more proactive style and Police's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. KCCA carry the stronger overall league profile, standing 5 with 19 points while Police sit 7 on 15, suggesting a clearer edge in long-term output. KCCA look sharper on recent form, and that momentum could be important in key phases of the match. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Given the broader gap between the sides, Away Win looks like the most logical direction, while the clean-sheet expectation leans toward KCCA. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward KCCA having the stronger overall control.
So far, Police have built a campaign that leaves them 7 in the table on 15 points from 10 matches. Across the campaign, they have posted 4 wins, 3 draws, and 3 losses, while the 10:13 goal ratio supports the view of mixed form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been very solid. At home, the record of 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 losses points toward a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their broader style still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.
KCCA come into this fixture from a strong position, holding 5 place with 19 points after 9 matches. With 6 wins, 1 draws, and 2 defeats plus a goal balance of 12:6, they continue to show very strong form and are on a winning streak. Their attacking quality is driven by their main attacking players, and at the back they have appeared very solid. Away from home, the split of 3 wins, 1 draws, and 1 losses supports the view of a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their football identity still points toward balanced attacking football.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 19:5 | 14 | 23 |
W
W
W
L
W
|
|
| 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 18:6 | 12 | 23 |
W
D
W
W
D
|
|
| 3 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 19:6 | 13 | 21 |
L
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 11:4 | 7 | 19 |
W
D
D
W
D
|
|
| 5 |
KCCA
Away
|
9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 12:6 | 6 | 19 |
W
W
W
W
W
|
| 6 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19:5 | 14 | 17 |
W
W
L
L
D
|
|
| 7 |
Police
Home
|
10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10:13 | -3 | 15 |
D
W
W
D
L
|
| 8 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 11:13 | -2 | 13 |
W
W
W
L
D
|
|
| 9 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 11:15 | -4 | 13 |
L
L
D
W
L
|
|
| 10 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7:4 | 3 | 12 |
D
W
W
W
D
|
|
| 11 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 13:11 | 2 | 11 |
L
D
W
D
W
|
|
| 12 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 10:11 | -1 | 11 |
W
D
D
D
L
|
|
| 13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4:8 | -4 | 8 |
L
L
L
L
W
|
|
| 14 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5:10 | -5 | 8 |
L
L
W
L
W
|
|
| 15 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6:15 | -9 | 8 |
L
L
L
D
D
|
|
| 16 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5:17 | -12 | 4 |
L
W
L
L
L
|
|
| 17 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6:22 | -16 | 4 |
L
D
L
L
W
|
|
| 18 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10:25 | -15 | 3 |
L
L
D
L
L
|