Olympic vs Rosengård Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
64%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
82.5%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
77.2%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
Olympic
Rosengård
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Olympic
30 matches
Rosengård
32 matches
| Olympic | Statistic | Rosengård |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Wins | 13 |
| 6 | Draws | 10 |
| 11 | Losses | 9 |
| 52 | Goals For | 52 |
| 51 | Goals Against | 44 |
| 1.73 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.63 |
| 1.7 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.38 |
| 22 | BTTS Yes | 20 |
| 27 | Over 1.5 | 27 |
| 20 | Over 2.5 | 18 |
| 13 | Over 3.5 | 11 |
| 5 | Clean Sheets | 6 |
| 4 | Failed To Score | 8 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From a tactical perspective, this fixture features Rosengård's more proactive style and Olympic's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward Rosengård. Olympic have shown more instability in their recent run, so confidence and game management may become important factors. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Rosengård having the stronger overall control. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. A relatively balanced game with moderate goal potential looks most likely.
Olympic approach this match from a more delicate league position, standing 11 with 26 points from 21 matches. The overall return of 8 wins, 2 draws, and 11 defeats with a 38:43 goal balance points toward poor form over their recent run. Going forward they depend heavily on their main attacking players, while defensively they have looked quite vulnerable. At home, the split record of 6 wins, 1 draws, and 4 losses points to a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Their broader football approach still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.
Rosengård arrive from the upper part of the table, holding 5 place with 34 points after 21 matches. The record of 9 wins, 7 draws, and 5 defeats, together with a 35:28 goal balance, points toward mixed form over their recent run. Much of their attacking threat comes through their main attacking players, while at the back they have looked fairly stable. Away from home, they have returned 4 wins, 5 draws, and 2 losses, a split that suggests a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. In football terms, they tend to show balanced attacking football.
Across those 15 head-to-head meetings, Olympic won 6 times, Rosengård won 7 times, while 2 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 23:21 from Olympic's perspective. 8 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 7 matches, with an average of 2.93 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 44:24 | 20 | 42 |
W
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 2 | 21 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 41:26 | 15 | 39 |
L
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 3 | 21 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 45:32 | 13 | 39 |
W
D
L
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 21 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 44:26 | 18 | 38 |
W
D
W
W
L
|
|
| 5 |
Rosengård
Away
|
21 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 35:28 | 7 | 34 |
L
W
W
D
D
|
| 6 | 21 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 28:28 | 0 | 33 |
D
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 7 | 21 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 39:31 | 8 | 32 |
D
D
D
L
D
|
|
| 8 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 33:33 | 0 | 28 |
W
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 9 | 21 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 25:20 | 5 | 27 |
D
L
W
D
D
|
|
| 10 | 21 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 23:29 | -6 | 27 |
W
W
D
W
L
|
|
| 11 |
Olympic
Home
|
21 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 38:43 | -5 | 26 |
L
W
L
L
D
|
| 12 | 21 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 32:38 | -6 | 25 |
L
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 13 | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 25:33 | -8 | 21 |
D
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 14 | 21 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 28:38 | -10 | 21 |
W
L
D
L
D
|
|
| 15 | 21 | 3 | 8 | 10 | 25:39 | -14 | 17 |
L
L
L
L
L
|
|
| 16 | 21 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 17:54 | -37 | 8 |
L
D
L
D
D
|