SWEDEN ETTAN - SöDRA
20.09.2026 11:00

Olympic vs Rosengård Prediction & Match Analysis

Full analysis and predictions for all markets

1X2
Home Win
Probability 64%
Odds -
BTTS
Yes
Probability 82.5%
Odds -
Over / Under 2.5
Over 2.5
Probability 77.2%
Odds -
All Markets
Market Option Probability Odds Stats & Analysis
1X2 Home Win
64%
-
BTTS Yes
82.5%
-
Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5
77.2%
-
Corners O/U Over 7.5 Corners
87.7%
-
HT / FT Home / Home
-
-
Correct Score 2-1
-
-
Probability Distribution
Olympic Win 64%
Draw 5.1%
Rosengård Win 30.9%
Expected Goals (xG)
Olympic1.59
Rosengård1.66
Recent Form (Last 5)
Olympic Olympic
WWDLW
52 GF / 51 GA
Rosengård Rosengård
WLDWL
52 GF / 44 GA
Key Stats
1.73
Average Goals Scored
1.63
1.7
Average Goals Conceded
1.38
22
BTTS Yes
20
20
Over 2.5
18
0
Shots on Goal
0

Statistics are based on season averages

Season Statistics

Team averages and season trends before this fixture

Olympic Olympic 30 matches
Rosengård Rosengård 32 matches
Olympic Statistic Rosengård
13 Wins 13
6 Draws 10
11 Losses 9
52 Goals For 52
51 Goals Against 44
1.73 Avg Goals Scored 1.63
1.7 Avg Goals Conceded 1.38
22 BTTS Yes 20
27 Over 1.5 27
20 Over 2.5 18
13 Over 3.5 11
5 Clean Sheets 6
4 Failed To Score 8
0 Shots On Goal 0
0 Total Shots 0
0 Corners 0
0% Ball Possession 0%

Match Analysis

Model notes, team context and key prediction signals

Final Verdict

From a tactical perspective, this fixture features Rosengård's more proactive style and Olympic's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward Rosengård. Olympic have shown more instability in their recent run, so confidence and game management may become important factors. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Rosengård having the stronger overall control. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. A relatively balanced game with moderate goal potential looks most likely.

Olympic Analysis

Olympic approach this match from a more delicate league position, standing 11 with 26 points from 21 matches. The overall return of 8 wins, 2 draws, and 11 defeats with a 38:43 goal balance points toward poor form over their recent run. Going forward they depend heavily on their main attacking players, while defensively they have looked quite vulnerable. At home, the split record of 6 wins, 1 draws, and 4 losses points to a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Their broader football approach still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.

Rosengård Analysis

Rosengård arrive from the upper part of the table, holding 5 place with 34 points after 21 matches. The record of 9 wins, 7 draws, and 5 defeats, together with a 35:28 goal balance, points toward mixed form over their recent run. Much of their attacking threat comes through their main attacking players, while at the back they have looked fairly stable. Away from home, they have returned 4 wins, 5 draws, and 2 losses, a split that suggests a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. In football terms, they tend to show balanced attacking football.

H2H Analysis

Across those 15 head-to-head meetings, Olympic won 6 times, Rosengård won 7 times, while 2 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 23:21 from Olympic's perspective. 8 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 7 matches, with an average of 2.93 goals per game.

1X2: Home Win
BTTS: Yes
Over/Under 2.5: Over 2.5
Highest model probability: 12 (94.9%)
H2H summary: Olympic wins 6, draws 2, Rosengård wins 7

Standings

South
# Team MP W D L G GD PTS Form
1 21 12 6 3 44:24 20 42
W L W L L
2 21 12 3 6 41:26 15 39
L W W W W
3 21 11 6 4 45:32 13 39
W D L W W
4 21 10 8 3 44:26 18 38
W D W W L
5 21 9 7 5 35:28 7 34
L W W D D
6 21 9 6 6 28:28 0 33
D W D W W
7 21 8 8 5 39:31 8 32
D D D L D
8 21 7 7 7 33:33 0 28
W W L W W
9 21 7 6 8 25:20 5 27
D L W D D
10 21 6 9 6 23:29 -6 27
W W D W L
11 21 8 2 11 38:43 -5 26
L W L L D
12 21 7 4 10 32:38 -6 25
L L L D W
13 21 5 6 10 25:33 -8 21
D L W L L
14 21 6 3 12 28:38 -10 21
W L D L D
15 21 3 8 10 25:39 -14 17
L L L L L
16 21 1 5 15 17:54 -37 8
L D L D D