Niva vs Gomel II Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
88%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
75%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
77.2%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
Niva
Gomel II
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Niva
30 matches
Gomel II
27 matches
| Niva | Statistic | Gomel II |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Wins | 5 |
| 5 | Draws | 6 |
| 7 | Losses | 16 |
| 70 | Goals For | 36 |
| 40 | Goals Against | 55 |
| 2.33 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.33 |
| 1.33 | Avg Goals Conceded | 2.04 |
| 19 | BTTS Yes | 16 |
| 26 | Over 1.5 | 23 |
| 23 | Over 2.5 | 18 |
| 14 | Over 3.5 | 12 |
| 8 | Clean Sheets | 5 |
| 4 | Failed To Score | 8 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
On paper, this fixture places two sides in different competitive situations, shaped by Niva's more proactive style and Gomel II's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Niva arrive from the stronger league position, sitting 2 with 55 points compared to Gomel II in 17 on 21, which underlines the gap in season consistency. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Gomel II having the stronger overall control. Gomel II arrive with more visible recent inconsistency, which may leave them vulnerable if the match starts badly. The attacking numbers of both teams point toward a more open scoring environment.This game has the potential to be open, with both sides capable of creating several scoring chances. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring Gomel II.
Niva approach this game with the confidence of a side sitting 2 on 55 points after 27 outings. They have recorded 17 wins, 4 draws, and 6 losses, with a 67:31 goal return and good form over their recent run. In attack they lean heavily on their main attacking players, while defensively they have looked fairly stable. At home, their record of 10 wins, 2 draws, and 1 losses points to a very strong split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Their overall playing style can be described as balanced attacking football.
With 21 points from 27 games and a place of 17, Gomel II still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. Their record of 5 wins, 6 draws, and 16 losses, together with goals at 36:55, reflects poor form and are going through a difficult losing run. Much of their threat comes through their main attacking players, while the defensive numbers suggest they have been quite vulnerable. Away from home, they have managed 2 wins, 4 draws, and 7 losses, a return that supports a weak split record. They are under visible pressure near the relegation zone. In football terms they often show a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 3 head-to-head meetings, Niva won 2 times, Gomel II won 1 times, while 0 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 3:2 from Niva's perspective. 1 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 1 matches, with an average of 1.67 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 56:28 | 28 | 57 |
W
W
W
W
D
|
|
| 2 |
Niva
Home
|
27 | 17 | 4 | 6 | 67:31 | 36 | 55 |
D
W
L
W
W
|
| 3 | 27 | 17 | 3 | 7 | 51:43 | 8 | 54 |
W
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 27 | 16 | 5 | 6 | 56:31 | 25 | 53 |
W
W
W
L
W
|
|
| 5 | 27 | 14 | 5 | 8 | 49:32 | 17 | 47 |
D
W
W
D
W
|
|
| 6 | 26 | 14 | 3 | 9 | 45:40 | 5 | 45 |
L
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 7 | 27 | 12 | 5 | 10 | 52:41 | 11 | 41 |
W
D
W
L
L
|
|
| 8 | 27 | 11 | 7 | 9 | 52:44 | 8 | 40 |
D
W
W
W
D
|
|
| 9 | 25 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 42:37 | 5 | 35 |
W
D
L
W
W
|
|
| 10 | 27 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 37:39 | -2 | 35 |
D
D
L
W
W
|
|
| 11 | 27 | 10 | 4 | 13 | 40:50 | -10 | 34 |
L
L
L
L
W
|
|
| 12 | 27 | 9 | 6 | 12 | 33:36 | -3 | 33 |
W
L
W
W
D
|
|
| 13 | 27 | 9 | 3 | 15 | 37:50 | -13 | 30 |
L
L
D
L
L
|
|
| 14 | 27 | 7 | 6 | 14 | 28:51 | -23 | 27 |
D
L
L
D
L
|
|
| 15 | 26 | 6 | 8 | 12 | 25:35 | -10 | 26 |
D
L
L
D
L
|
|
| 16 | 27 | 5 | 7 | 15 | 36:61 | -25 | 22 |
D
L
L
W
L
|
|
| 17 |
Gomel II
Away
|
27 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 36:55 | -19 | 21 |
L
L
L
L
L
|
| 18 | 27 | 5 | 4 | 18 | 29:67 | -38 | 19 |
L
D
D
L
L
|