Niva vs BATE II Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
67.7%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
67.1%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
66.7%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
Niva
BATE II
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Niva
16 matches
BATE II
13 matches
| Niva | Statistic | BATE II |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Wins | 2 |
| 3 | Draws | 5 |
| 5 | Losses | 6 |
| 31 | Goals For | 19 |
| 25 | Goals Against | 28 |
| 1.94 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.46 |
| 1.56 | Avg Goals Conceded | 2.15 |
| 11 | BTTS Yes | 10 |
| 14 | Over 1.5 | 12 |
| 12 | Over 2.5 | 7 |
| 7 | Over 3.5 | 5 |
| 3 | Clean Sheets | 1 |
| 2 | Failed To Score | 3 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From the opening view, this looks like a meeting between teams arriving with different levels of stability, reinforced by Niva's more proactive style and BATE II's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. Niva arrive from the stronger league position, sitting 8 with 20 points compared to BATE II in 14 on 11, which underlines the gap in season consistency. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring BATE II. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward BATE II having the stronger overall control.
From their first 12 matches, Niva have collected 20 points and now occupy 8 place in the table. Across the campaign, they have posted 6 wins, 2 draws, and 4 losses, while the 25:15 goal ratio supports the view of good form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been very solid. At home, the record of 3 wins, 2 draws, and 1 losses points toward a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Their broader style still suggests balanced attacking football.
BATE II sit 14 with 11 points after 12 matches and remain under pressure to produce steadier results. Across the season they have posted 2 wins, 5 draws, and 5 defeats, and the 16:24 goal record continues to suggest poor form over their recent run. Their attacking burden often falls on their main attacking players, while at the back they have been very solid. Away from home, they have returned 1 wins, 4 draws, and 2 losses, which indicates a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they tend to play with a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 5 head-to-head meetings, Niva won 3 times, BATE II won 1 times, while 1 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 17:6 from Niva's perspective. 3 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 3 matches, with an average of 4.6 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Niva
Home
|
24 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 63:30 | 33 | 51 |
W
W
W
L
W
|
| 2 | 24 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 45:24 | 21 | 48 |
W
D
W
D
D
|
|
| 3 | 24 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 47:38 | 9 | 48 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 4 | 24 | 13 | 5 | 6 | 45:29 | 16 | 44 |
L
W
W
L
W
|
|
| 5 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 41:34 | 7 | 42 |
D
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 6 | 24 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 45:30 | 15 | 40 |
D
W
L
W
L
|
|
| 7 | 24 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 43:37 | 6 | 34 |
L
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 8 | 24 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 39:41 | -2 | 34 |
L
W
L
L
L
|
|
| 9 | 24 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 46:43 | 3 | 33 |
W
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 10 | 24 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 33:34 | -1 | 33 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 11 | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 41:37 | 4 | 32 |
D
L
W
W
L
|
|
| 12 | 24 | 9 | 2 | 13 | 35:45 | -10 | 29 |
L
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 13 | 24 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 29:34 | -5 | 27 |
W
D
L
L
W
|
|
| 14 | 24 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 27:43 | -16 | 26 |
D
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 15 | 24 | 6 | 7 | 11 | 24:33 | -9 | 25 |
L
D
L
W
D
|
|
| 16 | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 33:47 | -14 | 21 |
L
L
D
L
L
|
|
| 17 |
BATE II
Away
|
24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 34:55 | -21 | 21 |
W
L
D
W
W
|
| 18 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 17 | 25:61 | -36 | 17 |
L
L
L
W
D
|