New England Revolution vs Chicago Fire H2H Stats
Compare football head-to-head records, previous meetings, wins, draws, BTTS and Over 2.5 trends before reading the match prediction.
View today's football H2H statsNew England Revolution vs Chicago Fire Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home or Draw |
69.3%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
82.5%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
82.2%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
92%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
New England Revolution
Chicago Fire
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
New England Revolution
34 matches
Chicago Fire
35 matches
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Wins | 16 |
| 5 | Draws | 9 |
| 12 | Losses | 10 |
| 64 | Goals For | 61 |
| 48 | Goals Against | 51 |
| 1.88 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.74 |
| 1.41 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.46 |
| 22 | BTTS Yes | 24 |
| 29 | Over 1.5 | 28 |
| 25 | Over 2.5 | 25 |
| 11 | Over 3.5 | 14 |
| 6 | Clean Sheets | 10 |
| 7 | Failed To Score | 4 |
| 4.9 | Shots On Goal | 5.17 |
| 12.48 | Total Shots | 14.1 |
| 4.86 | Corners | 4.31 |
| 50.7% | Ball Possession | 51.3% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
There is very little separating these two teams on paper, and two sides with a fairly similar football identity points toward a competitive game. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Even if this develops into a close game, the analytical lean still edges toward Away Win, with a cautious clean-sheet angle toward Chicago Fire. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. The shape dynamic also adds another layer here, with New England Revolution expected to line up in 4-3-3 and Chicago Fire in 4-4-2, which may reinforce the expected flow toward Chicago Fire having the stronger overall control. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. There is little separation in the broader season picture, with both sides operating from relatively comparable league positions and points returns. The attacking numbers of both teams point toward a more open scoring environment.This game has the potential to be open, with both sides capable of creating several scoring chances.
New England Revolution approach this game with the confidence of a side sitting 2 on 46 points after 27 outings. The return of 14 wins, 4 draws, and 9 defeats, together with goals at 45:36, reflects good form over their recent run. Much of their attacking edge comes through Carles Gil (11 goals), Peyton Miller (5 goals), Dor Turgeman (4 goals), with creative support from Dor Turgeman (6 assists), Carles Gil (3 assists), M. Polster (2 assists), while their defending has remained fairly stable. At home, they have managed 9 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses, which underlines a very strong split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. In stylistic terms they continue to show balanced attacking football.
Placed 4 with 45 points from 27 outings, Chicago Fire continue to operate from a strong competitive position. Across the campaign, they have posted 13 wins, 6 draws, and 8 losses, while the 49:39 goal ratio supports the view of mixed form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on M. Haile-Selassie (8 goals), Hugo Cuypers (8 goals), P. Zinckernagel (6 goals), with creative support from P. Zinckernagel (7 assists), M. Haile-Selassie (5 assists), R. Lewandowski (3 assists), and defensively they have been fairly stable. Away from home, their split return of 5 wins, 5 draws, and 4 losses fits a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Stylistically, they usually display balanced attacking football.
Across those 15 head-to-head meetings, New England Revolution won 4 times, Chicago Fire won 2 times, while 9 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 25:24 from New England Revolution's perspective. 10 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 13 matches, with an average of 3.27 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 23 | 8 | 3 | 71:25 | 46 | 77 |
W
W
D
W
D
|
|
| 2 | 34 | 16 | 12 | 6 | 80:59 | 21 | 60 |
D
W
D
L
W
|
|
| 3 | 34 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 55:47 | 8 | 58 |
L
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 4 |
Chicago Fire
Away
|
34 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 64:54 | 10 | 55 |
L
W
D
W
L
|
| 5 | 34 | 15 | 9 | 10 | 66:51 | 15 | 54 |
D
W
W
L
D
|
|
| 6 | 34 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 66:52 | 14 | 50 |
W
L
D
L
D
|
|
| 7 | 34 | 14 | 5 | 15 | 59:52 | 7 | 47 |
W
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 8 | 34 | 13 | 7 | 14 | 63:78 | -15 | 46 |
W
L
D
D
W
|
|
| 9 | 34 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 67:75 | -8 | 46 |
L
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 10 | 34 | 12 | 6 | 16 | 48:62 | -14 | 42 |
W
L
L
W
L
|
|
| 11 | 34 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 49:45 | 4 | 42 |
W
D
W
D
D
|
|
| 12 | 34 | 9 | 12 | 13 | 52:67 | -15 | 39 |
L
L
W
L
W
|
|
| 13 | 34 | 9 | 6 | 19 | 43:60 | -17 | 33 |
L
W
L
L
L
|
|
| 14 | 34 | 7 | 12 | 15 | 39:61 | -22 | 33 |
L
L
L
L
L
|
|
| 15 | 34 | 6 | 8 | 20 | 37:69 | -32 | 26 |
L
D
L
L
D
|