Predictions & Statistics
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
61.4%
|
2.63 | |
| BTTS | Yes |
58.8%
|
1.62 | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
58.6%
|
1.74 | |
| Corners O/U | Under 7.5 Corners |
92%
|
4.30 | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
4.33 | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
10.00 |
MP
EIF
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
MP
24 matches
EIF
22 matches
| MP | Statistic | EIF |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Wins | 10 |
| 4 | Draws | 2 |
| 11 | Losses | 10 |
| 30 | Goals For | 34 |
| 33 | Goals Against | 36 |
| 1.25 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.55 |
| 1.38 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.64 |
| 13 | BTTS Yes | 11 |
| 16 | Over 1.5 | 16 |
| 11 | Over 2.5 | 13 |
| 7 | Over 3.5 | 7 |
| 4 | Clean Sheets | 7 |
| 7 | Failed To Score | 5 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
There is very little separating these two teams on paper, and two sides with a fairly similar football identity points toward a competitive game. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. There is little separation in the broader season picture, with both sides operating from relatively comparable league positions and points returns. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward EIF having the stronger overall control. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring EIF. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest.
MP sit 7 with 21 points after 18 league matches. Across the campaign, they have posted 6 wins, 3 draws, and 9 losses, while the 19:24 goal ratio supports the view of poor form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been very solid. At home, their split return of 4 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses fits a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Stylistically, they usually display a more cautious and defensive approach.
EIF sit 6 with 23 points after 18 league matches. Their overall return of 7 wins, 2 draws, and 9 losses with goals at 24:30 reflects mixed form over their recent run. Their attacking weight is carried by their main attacking players, while defensively they have appeared fairly stable. Away from home, the record of 1 wins, 2 draws, and 6 losses points toward a weak split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their broader style still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 15 head-to-head meetings, MP won 2 times, EIF won 9 times, while 4 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 12:24 from MP's perspective. 7 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 7 matches, with an average of 2.4 goals per game.
MP
JäPS
MP
KäPa
MP
Kooteepee
MP
JIPPO
MP
SJK Akatemia
MP
Haka
MP
PK-35
MP
Klubi-04
MP
EIF
MP
EIF
MP
JäPS
MP
JIPPO
MP
PK-35
MP
Haka
MP
Klubi-04
MP
KäPa
MP
Kooteepee
MP
SJK Akatemia
MP
JJK
MP
Ilves
EIF
KäPa
EIF
Klubi-04
EIF
SJK Akatemia
EIF
JäPS
EIF
Haka
EIF
PK-35
EIF
JIPPO
EIF
Kooteepee
EIF
MP
EIF
MP
EIF
KäPa
EIF
SJK Akatemia
EIF
Haka
EIF
Kooteepee
EIF
JäPS
EIF
Klubi-04
EIF
JIPPO
EIF
PK-35
EIF
Mariehamn
EIF
Turku PS
MP
KäPa
MP
Kooteepee
MP
Haka
MP
Klubi-04
MP
EIF
MP
JIPPO
MP
Haka
MP
KäPa
MP
JJK
MP
MyPa
MP
PEPO
MP
Atlantis
EIF
KäPa
EIF
SJK Akatemia
EIF
Haka
EIF
JIPPO
EIF
Kooteepee
EIF
MP
EIF
Haka
EIF
JäPS
EIF
PK-35
EIF
Mariehamn
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 33:20 | 13 | 42 |
W
W
W
D
L
|
|
| 2 | 19 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 31:14 | 17 | 38 |
D
W
L
D
W
|
|
| 3 | 19 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 38:20 | 18 | 37 |
W
W
W
W
D
|
|
| 4 | 19 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 24:16 | 8 | 31 |
L
L
W
D
W
|
|
| 5 | 19 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 18:26 | -8 | 28 |
L
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 6 |
EIF
Away
|
19 | 8 | 2 | 9 | 26:30 | -4 | 26 |
W
W
W
D
L
|
| 7 |
MP
Home
|
19 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 19:26 | -7 | 21 |
L
L
W
D
L
|
| 8 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 20:32 | -12 | 16 |
L
L
L
L
L
|
|
| 9 | 19 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 15:24 | -9 | 13 |
D
L
L
L
W
|
|
| 10 | 19 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 9:25 | -16 | 12 |
W
L
L
D
D
|