Montpellier vs Clermont Foot Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
66.1%
|
- | |
| BTTS | BTTS No |
24.4%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
62.4%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
91.1%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-0 |
-
|
- |
Montpellier
Clermont Foot
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Montpellier
37 matches
Clermont Foot
33 matches
| Montpellier | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Wins | 7 |
| 8 | Draws | 11 |
| 11 | Losses | 15 |
| 50 | Goals For | 36 |
| 31 | Goals Against | 44 |
| 1.35 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.09 |
| 0.84 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.33 |
| 13 | BTTS Yes | 20 |
| 24 | Over 1.5 | 21 |
| 11 | Over 2.5 | 15 |
| 8 | Over 3.5 | 8 |
| 16 | Clean Sheets | 5 |
| 11 | Failed To Score | 10 |
| 4 | Shots On Goal | 3.28 |
| 11.6 | Total Shots | 10.38 |
| 5.2 | Corners | 3.75 |
| 51.2% | Ball Possession | 51.1% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From the opening view, this looks like a meeting between teams arriving with different levels of stability, reinforced by Montpellier's more proactive style and Clermont Foot's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. A relatively balanced game with moderate goal potential looks most likely. Montpellier arrive from the stronger league position, sitting 7 with 50 points compared to Clermont Foot in 14 on 31, which underlines the gap in season consistency. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors Clermont Foot. The shape dynamic also adds another layer here, with Montpellier expected to line up in 4-2-3-1 and Clermont Foot in 5-4-1, which may reinforce the expected flow toward Clermont Foot having the stronger overall control.
Montpellier sit 7 with 50 points after 32 league matches. The record of 14 wins, 8 draws, and 10 defeats, together with a 39:28 goal balance, points toward mixed form over their recent run. Much of their attacking threat comes through A. Mendy (11 goals), T. Savanier (5 goals), N. Mbuku (4 goals), with creative support from N. Mbuku (5 assists), A. Mendy (4 assists), T. Savanier (3 assists), while at the back they have looked fairly stable. At home, the record of 8 wins, 4 draws, and 4 losses points toward a very strong split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their broader style still suggests balanced attacking football.
Clermont Foot approach this match from a more delicate league position, standing 14 with 31 points from 32 matches. The overall return of 7 wins, 10 draws, and 15 defeats with a 35:43 goal balance points toward poor form over their recent run. Going forward they depend heavily on F. Diedhiou (10 goals), K. Bamba (8 goals), I. Fakili (4 goals), with creative support from K. Bamba (3 assists), I. Fakili (3 assists), Johan Gastien (3 assists), while defensively they have looked quite vulnerable. Away from home, they have returned 3 wins, 4 draws, and 9 losses, which indicates a weak split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they tend to play with a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 12 head-to-head meetings, Montpellier won 3 times, Clermont Foot won 4 times, while 5 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 13:15 from Montpellier's perspective. 4 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 9 matches, with an average of 2.33 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 20 | 7 | 7 | 60:33 | 27 | 67 |
L
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 2 | 34 | 16 | 14 | 4 | 50:31 | 19 | 62 |
W
D
D
W
D
|
|
| 3 | 34 | 18 | 6 | 10 | 59:38 | 21 | 60 |
W
L
L
L
W
|
|
| 4 | 34 | 16 | 10 | 8 | 45:37 | 8 | 58 |
D
W
W
L
W
|
|
| 5 | 34 | 15 | 13 | 6 | 45:39 | 6 | 58 |
W
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 6 | 34 | 14 | 14 | 6 | 53:35 | 18 | 56 |
W
D
D
W
D
|
|
| 7 | 34 | 15 | 7 | 12 | 49:39 | 10 | 52 |
L
W
W
W
D
|
|
| 8 |
Montpellier
Home
|
34 | 14 | 9 | 11 | 41:31 | 10 | 51 |
D
L
W
W
D
|
| 9 | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 48:62 | -14 | 45 |
L
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 10 | 34 | 11 | 10 | 13 | 53:45 | 8 | 43 |
L
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 11 | 34 | 10 | 10 | 14 | 42:49 | -7 | 40 |
L
L
L
L
D
|
|
| 12 | 34 | 8 | 15 | 11 | 33:39 | -6 | 39 |
W
W
D
L
D
|
|
| 13 |
Clermont Foot
Away
|
34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 38:44 | -6 | 37 |
W
W
D
L
D
|
| 14 | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 35:52 | -17 | 37 |
W
W
D
L
D
|
|
| 15 | 34 | 9 | 9 | 16 | 34:49 | -15 | 36 |
L
L
L
L
D
|
|
| 16 | 34 | 6 | 14 | 14 | 30:48 | -18 | 32 |
W
D
W
L
D
|
|
| 17 | 34 | 5 | 13 | 16 | 23:39 | -16 | 28 |
L
W
D
W
L
|
|
| 18 | 34 | 6 | 6 | 22 | 37:65 | -28 | 24 |
L
L
L
L
L
|