Lund vs Laholm H2H Stats
Compare football head-to-head records, previous meetings, wins, draws, BTTS and Over 2.5 trends before reading the match prediction.
View today's football H2H statsLund vs Laholm Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
81%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
67.1%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
61.1%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
Lund
Laholm
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Lund
33 matches
Laholm
33 matches
| Lund | Statistic | Laholm |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Wins | 9 |
| 9 | Draws | 5 |
| 9 | Losses | 19 |
| 60 | Goals For | 42 |
| 39 | Goals Against | 66 |
| 1.82 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.27 |
| 1.18 | Avg Goals Conceded | 2 |
| 18 | BTTS Yes | 21 |
| 25 | Over 1.5 | 25 |
| 17 | Over 2.5 | 23 |
| 12 | Over 3.5 | 15 |
| 11 | Clean Sheets | 6 |
| 7 | Failed To Score | 8 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This match appears to feature a noticeable gap in profile, built around Lund's more proactive style and Laholm's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward Laholm. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Lund arrive from the stronger league position, sitting 4 with 41 points compared to Laholm in 14 on 22, which underlines the gap in season consistency. A relatively balanced game with moderate goal potential looks most likely. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Laholm having the stronger overall control.
Lund approach this game with the confidence of a side sitting 4 on 41 points after 23 outings. They have recorded 11 wins, 8 draws, and 4 losses, with a 46:27 goal return and good form over their recent run. In attack they lean heavily on their main attacking players, while defensively they have looked fairly stable. At home, they have managed 8 wins, 0 draws, and 2 losses, which underlines a very strong split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. In stylistic terms they continue to show balanced attacking football.
With 22 points from 23 games and a place of 14, Laholm still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. Across the season they have posted 6 wins, 4 draws, and 13 defeats, and the 30:41 goal record continues to suggest poor form over their recent run. Their attacking burden often falls on their main attacking players, while at the back they have been quite vulnerable. Away from home, the split record of 3 wins, 1 draws, and 8 losses points to a weak split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Their broader football approach still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 1 head-to-head meetings, Lund won 0 times, Laholm won 1 times, while 0 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 3:4 from Lund's perspective. 1 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 1 matches, with an average of 7 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 57:28 | 29 | 57 |
W
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 26 | 15 | 3 | 8 | 47:30 | 17 | 48 |
W
W
L
L
W
|
|
| 3 | 26 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 50:36 | 14 | 47 |
D
D
W
W
L
|
|
| 4 |
Lund
Home
|
26 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 50:32 | 18 | 44 |
W
L
L
L
W
|
| 5 | 26 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 49:37 | 12 | 44 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 6 | 26 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 42:38 | 4 | 39 |
D
L
W
D
L
|
|
| 7 | 26 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 45:41 | 4 | 38 |
L
D
W
W
W
|
|
| 8 | 26 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 34:40 | -6 | 34 |
D
L
L
L
L
|
|
| 9 | 26 | 9 | 6 | 11 | 29:27 | 2 | 33 |
L
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 10 | 26 | 10 | 3 | 13 | 48:50 | -2 | 33 |
W
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 11 | 26 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 33:42 | -9 | 33 |
L
W
W
L
L
|
|
| 12 | 26 | 9 | 5 | 12 | 42:51 | -9 | 32 |
L
W
L
D
W
|
|
| 13 | 26 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 29:39 | -10 | 27 |
L
L
W
W
L
|
|
| 14 |
Laholm
Away
|
26 | 7 | 5 | 14 | 33:44 | -11 | 26 |
D
W
L
L
D
|
| 15 | 26 | 5 | 9 | 12 | 33:47 | -14 | 24 |
W
W
L
D
L
|
|
| 16 | 26 | 2 | 6 | 18 | 23:62 | -39 | 12 |
L
L
W
L
D
|