Lida vs Niva Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Away Win |
67.2%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
88%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
87%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Under 7.5 Corners |
92%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Draw / Away |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 1-2 |
-
|
- |
Lida
Niva
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Lida
23 matches
Niva
23 matches
| Lida | Statistic | Niva |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Wins | 14 |
| 3 | Draws | 4 |
| 9 | Losses | 5 |
| 41 | Goals For | 52 |
| 41 | Goals Against | 32 |
| 1.78 | Avg Goals Scored | 2.26 |
| 1.78 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.39 |
| 20 | BTTS Yes | 16 |
| 22 | Over 1.5 | 21 |
| 19 | Over 2.5 | 18 |
| 9 | Over 3.5 | 10 |
| 2 | Clean Sheets | 5 |
| 2 | Failed To Score | 2 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
Looking at the broader profile of both teams, this encounter highlights two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward Niva. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. The attacking numbers of both teams point toward a more open scoring environment.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Niva having the stronger overall control. Niva look sharper on recent form, and that momentum could be important in key phases of the match.
Lida approach this game with the confidence of a side sitting 4 on 36 points after 20 outings. The return of 11 wins, 3 draws, and 6 defeats, together with goals at 37:32, reflects good form over their recent run. Much of their attacking edge comes through their main attacking players, while their defending has remained fairly stable. At home, the split of 5 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses supports the view of a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their football identity still points toward balanced attacking football.
Operating from 1 place with 42 points from 20 games, Niva bring one of the stronger season profiles into this match. They have recorded 13 wins, 3 draws, and 4 losses, with a 49:23 goal return and very strong form and are on a winning streak. In attack they lean heavily on their main attacking players, while defensively they have looked very solid. Away from home, their record of 6 wins, 1 draws, and 3 losses points to a fairly balanced split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Their overall playing style can be described as balanced attacking football.
Across those 9 head-to-head meetings, Lida won 5 times, Niva won 3 times, while 1 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 16:9 from Lida's perspective. 4 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 4 matches, with an average of 2.78 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Niva
Away
|
24 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 63:30 | 33 | 51 |
W
W
W
L
W
|
| 2 | 24 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 45:24 | 21 | 48 |
W
D
W
D
D
|
|
| 3 |
Lida
Home
|
24 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 47:38 | 9 | 48 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
| 4 | 24 | 13 | 5 | 6 | 45:29 | 16 | 44 |
L
W
W
L
W
|
|
| 5 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 41:34 | 7 | 42 |
D
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 6 | 24 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 45:30 | 15 | 40 |
D
W
L
W
L
|
|
| 7 | 24 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 43:37 | 6 | 34 |
L
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 8 | 24 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 39:41 | -2 | 34 |
L
W
L
L
L
|
|
| 9 | 24 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 46:43 | 3 | 33 |
W
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 10 | 24 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 33:34 | -1 | 33 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 11 | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 41:37 | 4 | 32 |
D
L
W
W
L
|
|
| 12 | 24 | 9 | 2 | 13 | 35:45 | -10 | 29 |
L
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 13 | 24 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 29:34 | -5 | 27 |
W
D
L
L
W
|
|
| 14 | 24 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 27:43 | -16 | 26 |
D
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 15 | 24 | 6 | 7 | 11 | 24:33 | -9 | 25 |
L
D
L
W
D
|
|
| 16 | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 33:47 | -14 | 21 |
L
L
D
L
L
|
|
| 17 | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 34:55 | -21 | 21 |
W
L
D
W
W
|
|
| 18 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 17 | 25:61 | -36 | 17 |
L
L
L
W
D
|