Login Register
SWEDEN › ETTAN - SöDRA
24.10.2026 11:00
Glanninge Park

Laholm vs Olympic Prediction & Match Analysis

Full analysis and predictions for all markets

1X2
Away or Draw
Probability 68.3%
Odds -
BTTS
Yes
Probability 78.8%
Odds -
Over / Under 2.5
Over 2.5
Probability 61.1%
Odds -
All Markets
Market Option Probability Odds Stats & Analysis
1X2 Away or Draw
68.3%
- ▥
BTTS Yes
78.8%
- ▥
Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5
61.1%
- ▥
Corners O/U Over 7.5 Corners
87.7%
- ▥
HT / FT Draw / Away
-
- ▥
Correct Score 1-2
-
- ▥
Probability Distribution
Laholm Win 31.7%
Draw 18.1%
Olympic Win 50.2%
Expected Goals (xG)
Laholm1.41
Olympic1.84
Recent Form (Last 5)
Laholm Laholm
WWDLW
45 GF / 67 GA
Olympic Olympic
WLDWL
66 GF / 59 GA
Key Stats
1.25
Average Goals Scored
1.83
1.86
Average Goals Conceded
1.64
22
BTTS Yes
26
23
Over 2.5
23
0
Shots on Goal
0

Statistics are based on season averages

Season Statistics

Team averages and season trends before this fixture

Laholm Laholm 36 matches
Olympic Olympic 36 matches
Laholm Statistic Olympic
11 Wins 16
6 Draws 7
19 Losses 13
45 Goals For 66
67 Goals Against 59
1.25 Avg Goals Scored 1.83
1.86 Avg Goals Conceded 1.64
22 BTTS Yes 26
26 Over 1.5 32
23 Over 2.5 23
15 Over 3.5 15
8 Clean Sheets 6
8 Failed To Score 5
0 Shots On Goal 0
0 Total Shots 0
0 Corners 0
0% Ball Possession 0%

Match Analysis

Model notes, team context and key prediction signals

Final Verdict

From a tactical perspective, this fixture features two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. A relatively balanced game with moderate goal potential looks most likely. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors Olympic. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Olympic having the stronger overall control. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest.

Laholm Analysis

With 26 points from 26 games and a place of 14, Laholm still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. Their record of 7 wins, 5 draws, and 14 losses, together with goals at 33:44, reflects poor form over their recent run. Much of their threat comes through their main attacking players, while the defensive numbers suggest they have been quite vulnerable. At home, they have returned 3 wins, 4 draws, and 6 losses, which indicates a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they tend to play with a more cautious and defensive approach.

Olympic Analysis

Olympic are currently 10 in the standings with 33 points from 26 matches. The record of 10 wins, 3 draws, and 13 defeats, together with a 48:50 goal balance, points toward mixed form over their recent run. Much of their attacking threat comes through their main attacking players, while at the back they have looked quite vulnerable. Away from home, they have returned 4 wins, 1 draws, and 8 losses, a split that suggests a weak split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. In football terms, they tend to show a more cautious and defensive approach.

H2H Analysis

Across those 1 head-to-head meetings, Laholm won 0 times, Olympic won 1 times, while 0 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 2:3 from Laholm's perspective. 1 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 1 matches, with an average of 5 goals per game.

1X2: Away or Draw
BTTS: Yes
Over/Under 2.5: Over 2.5
Highest model probability: 12 (81.9%)
H2H summary: Laholm wins 0, draws 0, Olympic wins 1

Standings

South
# Team MP W D L G GD PTS Form
1 27 18 6 3 61:30 31 60
W W W W W
2 27 16 3 8 49:31 18 51
W W W L L
3 27 13 8 6 51:38 13 47
L D D W W
4 27 12 8 7 52:36 16 44
L W L L L
5 27 12 8 7 50:39 11 44
L W W W W
6 27 10 10 7 43:39 4 40
D D L W D
7 27 10 8 9 46:44 2 38
L L D W W
8 27 10 6 11 31:28 3 36
W L L L W
9 27 11 3 13 52:51 1 36
W W L L D
10 27 9 8 10 35:41 -6 35
D D L L L
11 27 8 10 9 35:44 -9 34
D L W W L
12 27 9 6 12 44:53 -9 33
D L W L D
13 27 8 6 13 32:40 -8 30
W L L W W
14 27 8 5 14 34:44 -10 29
W D W L L
15 27 5 9 13 33:48 -15 24
L W W L D
16 27 2 6 19 24:66 -42 12
L L L W L