KuPS vs AC Oulu Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
56.1%
|
- | |
| BTTS | No |
76.3%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
80.5%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Under 11.5 Corners |
80.3%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-0 |
-
|
- |
KuPS
AC Oulu
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
KuPS
36 matches
AC Oulu
27 matches
| KuPS | Statistic | AC Oulu |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Wins | 11 |
| 12 | Draws | 5 |
| 7 | Losses | 11 |
| 52 | Goals For | 30 |
| 34 | Goals Against | 32 |
| 1.44 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.11 |
| 0.94 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.19 |
| 19 | BTTS Yes | 12 |
| 27 | Over 1.5 | 15 |
| 12 | Over 2.5 | 10 |
| 7 | Over 3.5 | 5 |
| 13 | Clean Sheets | 9 |
| 7 | Failed To Score | 8 |
| 2.09 | Shots On Goal | 1.96 |
| 5.12 | Total Shots | 5.36 |
| 2.27 | Corners | 2 |
| 25.1% | Ball Possession | 21.4% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From a tactical perspective, this fixture features KuPS's more proactive style and AC Oulu's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward AC Oulu. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. AC Oulu arrive with more visible recent inconsistency, which may leave them vulnerable if the match starts badly. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. Both teams appear likely to operate from a similar base structure, so execution within the same shape could be more decisive than formation itself. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent.
Placed 1 with 43 points from 22 outings, KuPS continue to operate from a strong competitive position. Across the campaign, they have posted 12 wins, 7 draws, and 3 losses, while the 38:23 goal ratio supports the view of poor form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on J. Luyeye-Lutumba (3 goals), G. Engvall (1 goals), T. Jyry (1 goals), with creative support from P. Pennanen (2 assists), J. Luyeye-Lutumba (1 assists), G. Engvall (1 assists), and defensively they have been very solid. At home, they have returned 6 wins, 4 draws, and 1 losses, a split that suggests a very strong split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. In football terms, they tend to show balanced attacking football.
With 34 points from 22 games and a place of 5, AC Oulu still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. Across the season they have posted 10 wins, 4 draws, and 8 defeats, and the 25:25 goal record continues to suggest poor form and are going through a difficult losing run. Their attacking burden often falls on E. Kallio (1 goals), J. Paananen (1 goals), while at the back they have been very solid. Away from home, the split record of 4 wins, 2 draws, and 5 losses points to a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their broader football approach still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
KuPS
Home
|
22 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 38:23 | 15 | 43 |
W
D
D
L
L
|
| 2 | 22 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 29:16 | 13 | 42 |
W
W
L
W
D
|
|
| 3 | 22 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36:27 | 9 | 37 |
D
D
W
W
L
|
|
| 4 | 22 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 36:29 | 7 | 36 |
D
W
D
D
W
|
|
| 5 |
AC Oulu
Away
|
22 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 25:25 | 0 | 34 |
L
L
L
D
W
|
| 6 | 22 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 29:22 | 7 | 33 |
L
L
W
L
W
|
|
| 7 | 22 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 26:19 | 7 | 32 |
D
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 8 | 22 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 28:23 | 5 | 31 |
L
L
D
D
D
|
|
| 9 | 22 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 34:37 | -3 | 25 |
W
W
W
L
L
|
|
| 10 | 22 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 25:33 | -8 | 19 |
W
D
D
D
L
|
|
| 11 | 22 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 18:44 | -26 | 15 |
D
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 12 | 22 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 17:43 | -26 | 14 |
L
W
L
W
W
|