Kongsvinger vs hodd Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home Win |
66.8%
|
1.28 | |
| BTTS | Yes |
88%
|
1.50 | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
87%
|
1.23 | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
2.04 | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
1.73 | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
10.00 |
Kongsvinger
hodd
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Kongsvinger
30 matches
hodd
29 matches
| Kongsvinger | Statistic | hodd |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Wins | 12 |
| 7 | Draws | 5 |
| 5 | Losses | 12 |
| 79 | Goals For | 41 |
| 49 | Goals Against | 52 |
| 2.63 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.41 |
| 1.63 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.79 |
| 25 | BTTS Yes | 17 |
| 29 | Over 1.5 | 22 |
| 24 | Over 2.5 | 17 |
| 16 | Over 3.5 | 12 |
| 3 | Clean Sheets | 5 |
| 2 | Failed To Score | 9 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
On paper, this fixture places two sides in different competitive situations, shaped by Kongsvinger's more proactive style and hodd's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. The attacking numbers of both teams point toward a more open scoring environment.This game has the potential to be open, with both sides capable of creating several scoring chances. Kongsvinger come in with stronger recent momentum, which could help them control the rhythm for longer periods. Kongsvinger arrive from the stronger league position, sitting 1 with 46 points compared to hodd in 5 on 34, which underlines the gap in season consistency. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors hodd. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward hodd having the stronger overall control.
Kongsvinger come into this fixture from a strong position, holding 1 place with 46 points after 21 matches. With 14 wins, 4 draws, and 3 defeats plus a goal balance of 62:33, they continue to show very strong form with results showing strong momentum. Their attacking quality is driven by their main attacking players, and at the back they have appeared fairly stable. At home, the split of 8 wins, 2 draws, and 1 losses supports the view of a very strong split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Their football identity still points toward balanced attacking football.
hodd come into this fixture from a strong position, holding 5 place with 34 points after 21 matches. They have recorded 10 wins, 4 draws, and 7 losses, with a 37:38 goal return and good form over their recent run. In attack they lean heavily on their main attacking players, while defensively they have looked fairly stable. Away from home, the split of 3 wins, 3 draws, and 5 losses supports the view of a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their football identity still points toward a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 9 head-to-head meetings, Kongsvinger won 5 times, hodd won 2 times, while 2 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 13:9 from Kongsvinger's perspective. 6 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 4 matches, with an average of 2.44 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | 16 | 1 | 5 | 68:37 | 31 | 49 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 2 |
Kongsvinger
Home
|
22 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 63:34 | 29 | 47 |
D
W
D
W
W
|
| 3 | 22 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 58:31 | 27 | 45 |
W
D
W
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 22 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 55:28 | 27 | 42 |
L
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 5 | 23 | 11 | 2 | 10 | 32:31 | 1 | 35 |
W
W
L
L
W
|
|
| 6 |
hodd
Away
|
22 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 37:40 | -3 | 34 |
L
D
W
L
W
|
| 7 | 22 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 42:35 | 7 | 33 |
L
D
W
L
L
|
|
| 8 | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 35:39 | -4 | 29 |
D
D
D
L
L
|
|
| 9 | 22 | 8 | 4 | 10 | 38:44 | -6 | 28 |
W
D
D
W
W
|
|
| 10 | 22 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 52:57 | -5 | 25 |
D
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 11 | 22 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 33:48 | -15 | 25 |
D
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 12 | 22 | 7 | 3 | 12 | 31:40 | -9 | 24 |
L
D
W
L
L
|
|
| 13 | 22 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 37:51 | -14 | 23 |
D
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 14 | 22 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 36:51 | -15 | 22 |
L
W
L
D
L
|
|
| 15 | 23 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 34:52 | -18 | 20 |
L
D
D
D
L
|
|
| 16 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 26:59 | -33 | 19 |
W
L
L
L
L
|