Ind. Yumbo vs Quindio Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Away Win |
48.7%
|
- | |
| BTTS | No |
50.8%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
88%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Draw / Away |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 0-1 |
-
|
- |
Ind. Yumbo
Quindio
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Ind. Yumbo
21 matches
Quindio
27 matches
| Ind. Yumbo | Statistic | Quindio |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Wins | 14 |
| 8 | Draws | 8 |
| 5 | Losses | 5 |
| 21 | Goals For | 29 |
| 16 | Goals Against | 16 |
| 1 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.07 |
| 0.76 | Avg Goals Conceded | 0.59 |
| 8 | BTTS Yes | 10 |
| 15 | Over 1.5 | 13 |
| 2 | Over 2.5 | 9 |
| 1 | Over 3.5 | 1 |
| 8 | Clean Sheets | 14 |
| 7 | Failed To Score | 8 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
From a tactical perspective, this fixture features two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Quindio having the stronger overall control. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring Quindio.
Ind. Yumbo sit 8 with 29 points after 20 league matches. Across the campaign, they have posted 7 wins, 8 draws, and 5 losses, while the 19:16 goal ratio supports the view of good form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been very solid. At home, their split return of - wins, - draws, and - losses fits an unclear split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they usually display balanced attacking football.
Placed 3 with 49 points from 26 outings, Quindio continue to operate from a strong competitive position. Across the campaign, they have posted 14 wins, 7 draws, and 5 losses, while the 29:16 goal ratio supports the view of mixed form over their recent run. Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been very solid. Away from home, their split return of - wins, - draws, and - losses fits an unclear split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Stylistically, they usually display balanced attacking football.
Across those 1 head-to-head meetings, Ind. Yumbo won 0 times, Quindio won 0 times, while 1 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 0:0 from Ind. Yumbo's perspective. 0 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 0 matches, with an average of 0 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31 | 15 | 8 | 8 | 50:35 | 15 | 53 |
L
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 29 | 15 | 8 | 6 | 38:27 | 11 | 53 |
W
L
L
L
W
|
|
| 3 |
Quindio
Away
|
29 | 14 | 9 | 6 | 30:18 | 12 | 51 |
L
D
D
W
W
|
| 4 | 30 | 14 | 8 | 8 | 40:28 | 12 | 50 |
D
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 5 | 29 | 14 | 6 | 9 | 40:28 | 12 | 48 |
W
L
L
W
L
|
|
| 6 | 29 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 27:25 | 2 | 38 |
D
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 7 |
Ind. Yumbo
Home
|
23 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 23:16 | 7 | 36 |
W
D
W
W
L
|
| 8 | 24 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 29:29 | 0 | 34 |
L
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 9 | 29 | 9 | 7 | 13 | 35:39 | -4 | 34 |
L
L
W
W
L
|
|
| 10 | 29 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 23:30 | -7 | 34 |
D
L
L
W
L
|
|
| 11 | 23 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 27:27 | 0 | 27 |
W
W
W
L
D
|
|
| 12 | 22 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 17:23 | -6 | 25 |
L
L
L
W
D
|
|
| 13 | 23 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 24:32 | -8 | 23 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 14 | 22 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 23:29 | -6 | 21 |
W
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 15 | 23 | 4 | 7 | 12 | 14:37 | -23 | 19 |
D
L
L
L
D
|
|
| 16 | 23 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 20:37 | -17 | 17 |
L
D
W
W
D
|