Predictions & Statistics
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | No Draw |
86.4%
|
1.17 | |
| BTTS | Yes |
75%
|
1.53 | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
72%
|
1.46 | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
2.38 | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
9.00 |
Hume City
Melbourne City II
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Hume City
22 matches
Melbourne City II
21 matches
| Hume City | Statistic | Melbourne City II |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Wins | 8 |
| 4 | Draws | 6 |
| 6 | Losses | 7 |
| 42 | Goals For | 39 |
| 28 | Goals Against | 26 |
| 1.91 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.86 |
| 1.27 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.24 |
| 16 | BTTS Yes | 12 |
| 17 | Over 1.5 | 18 |
| 14 | Over 2.5 | 11 |
| 10 | Over 3.5 | 8 |
| 4 | Clean Sheets | 5 |
| 3 | Failed To Score | 4 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This match looks like a contest between two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Across the main signals in this matchup, Away Win remains the stronger lean, and the clean-sheet angle slightly favors Melbourne City II. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. Hume City have shown more instability in their recent run, so confidence and game management may become important factors. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Melbourne City II having the stronger overall control.
With 40 points from 22 games and a place of 3, Hume City still have clear room for improvement in overall consistency. Across the season they have posted 12 wins, 4 draws, and 6 defeats, and the 42:28 goal record continues to suggest poor form and are going through a difficult losing run. Their attacking burden often falls on their main attacking players, while at the back they have been fairly stable. At home, the split record of 6 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses points to a fairly balanced split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Their broader football approach still suggests balanced attacking football.
So far, Melbourne City II have built a campaign that leaves them 8 in the table on 30 points from 21 matches. Their overall return of 8 wins, 6 draws, and 7 losses with goals at 39:26 reflects mixed form over their recent run. Their attacking weight is carried by their main attacking players, while defensively they have appeared fairly stable. Away from home, their split return of 6 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses fits a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they usually display balanced attacking football.
Across those 1 head-to-head meetings, Hume City won 1 times, Melbourne City II won 0 times, while 0 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 1:0 from Hume City's perspective. 0 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 0 matches, with an average of 1 goals per game.
Hume City
St. Albans Saints
Hume City
Oakleigh Cannons
Hume City
Preston Lions
Hume City
Dandenong City
Hume City
Dandenong Thunder
Hume City
Green Gully
Hume City
Bentleigh Greens
Hume City
South Melbourne
Hume City
Altona Magic
Hume City
Avondale
Hume City
Sunshine Georgies
Hume City
Heidelberg United
Hume City
Melbourne City II
Hume City
St. Albans Saints
Hume City
Oakleigh Cannons
Hume City
Preston Lions
Hume City
Dandenong City
Hume City
Dandenong Thunder
Hume City
Green Gully
Hume City
Bentleigh Greens
Melbourne City II
Avondale
Melbourne City II
Sunshine Georgies
Melbourne City II
Heidelberg United
Melbourne City II
Altona Magic
Melbourne City II
St. Albans Saints
Melbourne City II
Oakleigh Cannons
Melbourne City II
Dandenong City
Melbourne City II
Dandenong Thunder
Melbourne City II
Green Gully
Melbourne City II
Bentleigh Greens
Melbourne City II
South Melbourne
Melbourne City II
Hume City
Melbourne City II
Avondale
Melbourne City II
Sunshine Georgies
Melbourne City II
Heidelberg United
Melbourne City II
Altona Magic
Melbourne City II
St. Albans Saints
Melbourne City II
Oakleigh Cannons
Melbourne City II
Preston Lions
Melbourne City II
Dandenong City
Hume City
Oakleigh Cannons
Hume City
Dandenong City
Hume City
Green Gully
Hume City
South Melbourne
Hume City
Avondale
Hume City
Heidelberg United
Hume City
St. Albans Saints
Hume City
Preston Lions
Hume City
Dandenong Thunder
Hume City
Bentleigh Greens
Hume City
Altona Magic
Melbourne City II
Sunshine Georgies
Melbourne City II
Altona Magic
Melbourne City II
St. Albans Saints
Melbourne City II
Oakleigh Cannons
Melbourne City II
Green Gully
Melbourne City II
Bentleigh Greens
Melbourne City II
South Melbourne
Melbourne City II
Avondale
Melbourne City II
Heidelberg United
Melbourne City II
Dandenong City
Melbourne City II
Dandenong Thunder
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 45:20 | 25 | 47 |
L
W
W
D
W
|
|
| 2 | 21 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 31:16 | 15 | 42 |
W
D
W
W
W
|
|
| 3 |
Hume City
Home
|
22 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 42:28 | 14 | 40 |
L
L
L
D
W
|
| 4 | 22 | 12 | 2 | 8 | 57:30 | 27 | 38 |
W
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 5 | 22 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 33:33 | 0 | 35 |
W
D
W
W
L
|
|
| 6 | 22 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 33:26 | 7 | 34 |
D
D
D
D
L
|
|
| 7 | 22 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 28:28 | 0 | 31 |
D
W
D
D
L
|
|
| 8 |
Melbourne City II
Away
|
21 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 39:26 | 13 | 30 |
L
L
D
W
W
|
| 9 | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 27:29 | -2 | 27 |
D
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 10 | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 27:39 | -12 | 27 |
W
D
D
D
L
|
|
| 11 | 22 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 26:36 | -10 | 26 |
W
D
W
L
W
|
|
| 12 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 20:46 | -26 | 19 |
L
W
L
L
L
|
|
| 13 | 22 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 23:48 | -25 | 15 |
L
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 14 | 22 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 17:43 | -26 | 14 |
D
W
L
W
W
|