hodd vs Kongsvinger Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | No Draw |
84.3%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
82.5%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
77.2%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
hodd
Kongsvinger
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
hodd
17 matches
Kongsvinger
18 matches
| hodd | Statistic | Kongsvinger |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Wins | 11 |
| 3 | Draws | 4 |
| 8 | Losses | 3 |
| 17 | Goals For | 39 |
| 25 | Goals Against | 26 |
| 1 | Avg Goals Scored | 2.17 |
| 1.47 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.44 |
| 8 | BTTS Yes | 14 |
| 11 | Over 1.5 | 18 |
| 7 | Over 2.5 | 14 |
| 5 | Over 3.5 | 8 |
| 4 | Clean Sheets | 2 |
| 6 | Failed To Score | 2 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This match appears to feature a noticeable gap in profile, built around Kongsvinger's more proactive style and hodd's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring Kongsvinger. Kongsvinger carry the stronger overall league profile, standing 2 with 23 points while hodd sit 7 on 14, suggesting a clearer edge in long-term output. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Kongsvinger having the stronger overall control.
From their first 10 matches, hodd have collected 14 points and now occupy 7 place in the table. Across the campaign, they have posted 4 wins, 2 draws, and 4 losses, while the 13:13 goal ratio supports the view of poor form . Going forward they rely heavily on their main attacking players, and defensively they have been very solid. At home, the record of 3 wins, 1 draws, and 1 losses points toward a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their broader style still suggests a more cautious and defensive approach.
Kongsvinger arrive from the upper part of the table, holding 2 place with 23 points after 10 matches. The record of 7 wins, 2 draws, and 1 defeats, together with a 23:11 goal balance, points toward poor form . Much of their attacking threat comes through their main attacking players, while at the back they have looked very solid. Away from home, the record of 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 losses points toward a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Their broader style still suggests balanced attacking football.
Across those 9 head-to-head meetings, hodd won 2 times, Kongsvinger won 5 times, while 2 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 9:13 from hodd's perspective. 6 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 4 matches, with an average of 2.44 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | 16 | 1 | 5 | 68:37 | 31 | 49 |
W
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 2 |
Kongsvinger
Away
|
22 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 63:34 | 29 | 47 |
D
W
D
W
W
|
| 3 | 22 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 58:31 | 27 | 45 |
W
D
W
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 22 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 55:28 | 27 | 42 |
L
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 5 |
hodd
Home
|
22 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 37:40 | -3 | 34 |
L
D
W
L
W
|
| 6 | 22 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 42:35 | 7 | 33 |
L
D
W
L
L
|
|
| 7 | 22 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 28:31 | -3 | 32 |
W
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 8 | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 35:39 | -4 | 29 |
D
D
D
L
L
|
|
| 9 | 22 | 8 | 4 | 10 | 38:44 | -6 | 28 |
W
D
D
W
W
|
|
| 10 | 22 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 52:57 | -5 | 25 |
D
D
L
L
L
|
|
| 11 | 22 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 33:48 | -15 | 25 |
D
W
W
W
L
|
|
| 12 | 22 | 7 | 3 | 12 | 31:40 | -9 | 24 |
L
D
W
L
L
|
|
| 13 | 22 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 37:51 | -14 | 23 |
D
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 14 | 22 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 36:51 | -15 | 22 |
L
W
L
D
L
|
|
| 15 | 22 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 34:48 | -14 | 20 |
D
D
D
L
W
|
|
| 16 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 26:59 | -33 | 19 |
W
L
L
L
L
|