Gomel II vs Niva Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | No Draw |
76.7%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
71.2%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
77.2%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
87.7%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
Gomel II
Niva
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Gomel II
10 matches
Niva
13 matches
| Gomel II | Statistic | Niva |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Wins | 5 |
| 4 | Draws | 3 |
| 4 | Losses | 5 |
| 12 | Goals For | 20 |
| 14 | Goals Against | 23 |
| 1.2 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.54 |
| 1.4 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.77 |
| 5 | BTTS Yes | 9 |
| 7 | Over 1.5 | 11 |
| 4 | Over 2.5 | 9 |
| 4 | Over 3.5 | 5 |
| 4 | Clean Sheets | 2 |
| 3 | Failed To Score | 2 |
| 0 | Shots On Goal | 0 |
| 0 | Total Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0% | Ball Possession | 0% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This match looks like a contest between Niva's more proactive style and Gomel II's more cautious structure. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. From a tactical point of view, the game still points toward Niva having the stronger overall control. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring Niva.
Gomel II approach this match from a more delicate league position, standing 15 with 9 points from 9 matches. Across the season they have posted 2 wins, 3 draws, and 4 defeats, and the 11:13 goal record continues to suggest poor form . Their attacking burden often falls on D. Emeljanov (5 goals), A. Savitskiy (3 goals), K. Lipnitskiy (3 goals), with creative support from A. Savitskiy (2 assists), A. Bondarchuk (2 assists), K. Lipnitskiy (1 assists), while at the back they have been very solid. At home, they have managed 1 wins, 1 draws, and 3 losses, a return that supports a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. In football terms they often show a more cautious and defensive approach.
Niva sit 9 with 13 points after 9 league matches. Their overall return of 4 wins, 1 draws, and 4 losses with goals at 16:13 reflects poor form . Their attacking weight is carried by D. Fedortsov (6 goals), P. Pampukha (3 goals), I. Monich (2 goals), with creative support from D. Fedortsov (2 assists), D. Galuza (2 assists), D. Sibilev (2 assists), while defensively they have appeared very solid. Away from home, their split return of 2 wins, 0 draws, and 3 losses fits a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they usually display balanced attacking football.
Across those 3 head-to-head meetings, Gomel II won 1 times, Niva won 2 times, while 0 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 2:3 from Gomel II's perspective. 1 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 1 matches, with an average of 1.67 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Niva
Away
|
25 | 16 | 3 | 6 | 63:31 | 32 | 51 |
L
W
W
W
L
|
| 2 | 25 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 48:24 | 24 | 51 |
W
W
D
W
D
|
|
| 3 | 25 | 15 | 3 | 7 | 47:42 | 5 | 48 |
L
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 4 | 25 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 48:30 | 18 | 47 |
W
L
W
W
L
|
|
| 5 | 25 | 14 | 3 | 8 | 44:36 | 8 | 45 |
W
D
W
W
W
|
|
| 6 | 25 | 13 | 4 | 8 | 46:30 | 16 | 43 |
W
D
W
L
W
|
|
| 7 | 25 | 11 | 4 | 10 | 47:37 | 10 | 37 |
W
L
L
L
W
|
|
| 8 | 25 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 49:43 | 6 | 36 |
W
W
D
L
L
|
|
| 9 | 25 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 42:37 | 5 | 35 |
W
D
L
W
W
|
|
| 10 | 25 | 10 | 4 | 11 | 40:44 | -4 | 34 |
L
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 11 | 25 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 35:37 | -2 | 33 |
L
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 12 | 25 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 30:34 | -4 | 30 |
W
W
D
L
L
|
|
| 13 | 25 | 9 | 3 | 13 | 36:46 | -10 | 30 |
D
L
L
L
D
|
|
| 14 | 25 | 7 | 5 | 13 | 27:46 | -19 | 26 |
L
D
L
W
L
|
|
| 15 | 25 | 6 | 7 | 12 | 24:34 | -10 | 25 |
L
L
D
L
W
|
|
| 16 |
Gomel II
Home
|
25 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 33:48 | -15 | 21 |
L
L
L
D
L
|
| 17 | 25 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 34:58 | -24 | 21 |
L
W
L
D
W
|
|
| 18 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 17 | 26:62 | -36 | 18 |
D
L
L
L
W
|