Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest H2H Stats
Compare football head-to-head records, previous meetings, wins, draws, BTTS and Over 2.5 trends before reading the match prediction.
View today's football H2H statsCrystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home or Draw |
71%
|
- | |
| BTTS | Yes |
62.8%
|
- | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
64.5%
|
- | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
79.9%
|
- | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
- | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
- |
Crystal Palace
Nottingham Forest
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Crystal Palace
11 matches
Nottingham Forest
14 matches
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Wins | 6 |
| 1 | Draws | 3 |
| 6 | Losses | 5 |
| 17 | Goals For | 17 |
| 21 | Goals Against | 14 |
| 1.55 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.21 |
| 1.91 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1 |
| 5 | BTTS Yes | 6 |
| 10 | Over 1.5 | 9 |
| 8 | Over 2.5 | 6 |
| 5 | Over 3.5 | 2 |
| 2 | Clean Sheets | 4 |
| 5 | Failed To Score | 5 |
| 4 | Shots On Goal | 3.4 |
| 11.5 | Total Shots | 16.4 |
| 3 | Corners | 3.4 |
| 44.7% | Ball Possession | 47.4% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This contest looks finely balanced, with two sides with a fairly similar football identity suggesting a close tactical battle. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Crystal Palace have shown more instability in their recent run, so confidence and game management may become important factors. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. Both teams appear likely to operate from a similar base structure, so execution within the same shape could be more decisive than formation itself. Taken together, the balance of indicators still supports Away Win, with the defensive lean favoring Nottingham Forest. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. There is little separation in the broader season picture, with both sides operating from relatively comparable league positions and points returns.
Crystal Palace approach this match from a more delicate league position, standing 15 with 4 points from 5 matches. The overall return of 1 wins, 1 draws, and 3 defeats with a 6:11 goal balance points toward poor form over their recent run. Going forward they depend heavily on T. Mitchell (2 goals), A. Khalaili (1 goals), J. Strand Larsen (1 goals), with creative support from D. Kamada (3 assists), E. Nketiah (1 assists), while defensively they have looked very solid. At home, they have returned 0 wins, 0 draws, and 2 losses, which indicates a fairly balanced split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they tend to play with a more cautious and defensive approach.
So far, Nottingham Forest have built a campaign that leaves them 13 in the table on 5 points from 5 matches. The record of 1 wins, 2 draws, and 2 defeats, together with a 4:5 goal balance, points toward poor form over their recent run. Much of their attacking threat comes through M. Gibbs-White (1 goals), D. Ndoye (1 goals), L. Delap (1 goals), with creative support from M. Gibbs-White (2 assists), Murillo (1 assists), while at the back they have looked very solid. Away from home, their split return of 1 wins, 1 draws, and 0 losses fits a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they usually display a more cautious and defensive approach.
Across those 12 head-to-head meetings, Crystal Palace won 1 times, Nottingham Forest won 3 times, while 8 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 9:13 from Crystal Palace's perspective. 2 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 7 matches, with an average of 1.83 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 19:7 | 12 | 21 |
W
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 11:5 | 6 | 18 |
W
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 3 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 23:5 | 18 | 16 |
W
W
W
W
D
|
|
| 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 17:13 | 4 | 13 |
W
W
L
D
L
|
|
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9:8 | 1 | 12 |
W
L
W
D
W
|
|
| 6 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 13:8 | 5 | 10 |
L
D
W
D
D
|
|
| 7 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 9:6 | 3 | 10 |
D
L
D
W
D
|
|
| 8 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 8:7 | 1 | 10 |
L
D
W
D
D
|
|
| 9 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8:7 | 1 | 9 |
L
D
L
D
D
|
|
| 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 11:15 | -4 | 9 |
L
W
L
W
L
|
|
| 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10:14 | -4 | 8 |
L
L
W
L
D
|
|
| 12 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7:11 | -4 | 8 |
W
D
W
L
D
|
|
| 13 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 10:10 | 0 | 7 |
D
D
D
L
D
|
|
| 14 |
Crystal Palace
Home
|
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9:17 | -8 | 7 |
L
W
D
L
W
|
| 15 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9:13 | -4 | 6 |
W
L
L
D
D
|
|
| 16 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6:10 | -4 | 6 |
W
D
L
D
D
|
|
| 17 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 6:14 | -8 | 6 |
L
W
W
L
L
|
|
| 18 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7:10 | -3 | 5 |
W
L
D
D
L
|
|
| 19 |
Nottingham Forest
Away
|
7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5:9 | -4 | 5 |
L
L
L
W
D
|
| 20 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6:14 | -8 | 4 |
L
L
L
L
D
|