Chicago Fire vs New England Revolution Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Home or Draw |
64%
|
1.28 | |
| BTTS | Yes |
88%
|
1.44 | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
82.2%
|
1.50 | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
92%
|
1.45 | |
| HT / FT | Home / Home |
-
|
3.00 | |
| Correct Score | 2-1 |
-
|
9.00 |
Chicago Fire
New England Revolution
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Chicago Fire
29 matches
New England Revolution
29 matches
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Wins | 14 |
| 9 | Draws | 5 |
| 7 | Losses | 10 |
| 53 | Goals For | 55 |
| 41 | Goals Against | 37 |
| 1.83 | Avg Goals Scored | 1.9 |
| 1.41 | Avg Goals Conceded | 1.28 |
| 20 | BTTS Yes | 19 |
| 23 | Over 1.5 | 24 |
| 20 | Over 2.5 | 20 |
| 12 | Over 3.5 | 9 |
| 9 | Clean Sheets | 6 |
| 3 | Failed To Score | 5 |
| 5.17 | Shots On Goal | 4.79 |
| 13.74 | Total Shots | 12.54 |
| 4.13 | Corners | 4.46 |
| 51.3% | Ball Possession | 50.6% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
This contest looks finely balanced, with two sides with a fairly similar football identity suggesting a close tactical battle. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward New England Revolution. The shape dynamic also adds another layer here, with Chicago Fire expected to line up in 4-3-3 and New England Revolution in 4-2-3-1, which may reinforce the expected flow toward New England Revolution having the stronger overall control. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest. There is little separation in the broader season picture, with both sides operating from relatively comparable league positions and points returns. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected.
Chicago Fire approach this game with the confidence of a side sitting 3 on 37 points after 21 outings. With 11 wins, 4 draws, and 6 defeats plus a goal balance of 39:28, they continue to show good form over their recent run. Their attacking quality is driven by Hugo Cuypers (8 goals), M. Haile-Selassie (6 goals), P. Zinckernagel (5 goals), with creative support from P. Zinckernagel (7 assists), M. Haile-Selassie (4 assists), R. Lewandowski (2 assists), and at the back they have appeared fairly stable. At home, their record of 7 wins, 0 draws, and 3 losses points to a very strong split record. They are competing near the top and remain under pressure to hold that position. Their overall playing style can be described as balanced attacking football.
New England Revolution come into this match from a strong league position, sitting 4 with 37 points from 22 matches. Their overall return of 11 wins, 4 draws, and 7 losses with goals at 36:27 reflects mixed form over their recent run. Their attacking weight is carried by Carles Gil (8 goals), D. Turgeman (3 goals), P. Miller (2 goals), with creative support from Carles Gil (3 assists), D. Turgeman (3 assists), M. Polster (2 assists), while defensively they have appeared fairly stable. Away from home, the record of 3 wins, 2 draws, and 5 losses points toward a fairly balanced split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. Their broader style still suggests balanced attacking football.
Across those 15 head-to-head meetings, Chicago Fire won 2 times, New England Revolution won 4 times, while 9 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 24:25 from Chicago Fire's perspective. 10 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 13 matches, with an average of 3.27 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 50:21 | 29 | 54 |
D
L
D
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 25 | 12 | 9 | 4 | 61:46 | 15 | 45 |
D
D
D
W
L
|
|
| 3 | 25 | 13 | 4 | 8 | 41:31 | 10 | 43 |
W
W
L
W
D
|
|
| 4 | 25 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 45:36 | 9 | 40 |
D
W
D
W
W
|
|
| 5 |
Chicago Fire
Home
|
24 | 11 | 6 | 7 | 45:35 | 10 | 39 |
L
D
D
D
D
|
| 6 | 25 | 10 | 4 | 11 | 44:56 | -12 | 34 |
W
W
W
D
W
|
|
| 7 | 25 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 39:33 | 6 | 32 |
W
L
D
D
D
|
|
| 8 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 52:59 | -7 | 32 |
D
L
L
D
W
|
|
| 9 | 24 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 41:39 | 2 | 30 |
W
W
W
D
D
|
|
| 10 | 25 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 33:48 | -15 | 30 |
W
L
D
L
D
|
|
| 11 | 24 | 6 | 11 | 7 | 30:37 | -7 | 29 |
D
W
D
L
L
|
|
| 12 | 25 | 6 | 11 | 8 | 38:46 | -8 | 29 |
L
W
D
D
W
|
|
| 13 | 25 | 6 | 5 | 14 | 35:42 | -7 | 23 |
L
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 14 | 25 | 6 | 5 | 14 | 29:43 | -14 | 23 |
D
L
D
L
W
|
|
| 15 | 25 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 31:51 | -20 | 21 |
L
L
L
L
D
|