Birmingham vs QPR H2H Stats
Compare football head-to-head records, previous meetings, wins, draws, BTTS and Over 2.5 trends before reading the match prediction.
View today's football H2H statsBirmingham vs QPR Prediction & Match Analysis
Full analysis and predictions for all markets
| Market | Option | Probability | Odds | Stats & Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X2 | Away Win |
60.8%
|
3.87 | |
| BTTS | Yes |
78.9%
|
1.73 | |
| Over / Under 2.5 | Over 2.5 |
64.5%
|
1.87 | |
| Corners O/U | Over 7.5 Corners |
92%
|
1.13 | |
| HT / FT | Draw / Away |
-
|
8.00 | |
| Correct Score | 1-2 |
-
|
13.00 |
Birmingham
QPR
Statistics are based on season averages
Season Statistics
Team averages and season trends before this fixture
Birmingham
15 matches
QPR
16 matches
| Birmingham | Statistic | QPR |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Wins | 9 |
| 6 | Draws | 6 |
| 1 | Losses | 1 |
| 28 | Goals For | 32 |
| 15 | Goals Against | 14 |
| 1.87 | Avg Goals Scored | 2 |
| 1 | Avg Goals Conceded | 0.88 |
| 10 | BTTS Yes | 10 |
| 12 | Over 1.5 | 11 |
| 11 | Over 2.5 | 9 |
| 6 | Over 3.5 | 7 |
| 5 | Clean Sheets | 5 |
| 1 | Failed To Score | 4 |
| 4.8 | Shots On Goal | 5.3 |
| 14 | Total Shots | 15.4 |
| 6.3 | Corners | 5.7 |
| 50.8% | Ball Possession | 48.7% |
Match Analysis
Model notes, team context and key prediction signals
Looking at the broader profile of both teams, this encounter highlights two sides with a fairly similar football identity. Squad availability does not appear severe enough to completely reshape the expected balance, although smaller absences can still influence specific duels. Overall, the preferred tip is Away Win, while the clean-sheet lean points toward QPR. The shape dynamic also adds another layer here, with Birmingham expected to line up in 4-2-3-1 and QPR in 4-4-2, which may reinforce the expected flow toward QPR having the stronger overall control. The defensive profile of this fixture suggests that clear openings may be harder to create.This profiles as a tighter contest, with fewer clear openings expected. The broader competitive context suggests that patience and control may be just as important as raw attacking intent. The season profile of both teams suggests a matchup where long-term consistency matters, but does not fully remove the possibility of swings in momentum on the day. Recent form does not point to a completely one-sided rhythm, which increases the chance of a more tactical and phase-based contest.
Birmingham are currently 10 in the standings with 11 points from 8 matches. The record of 2 wins, 5 draws, and 1 defeats, together with a 12:11 goal balance, points toward poor form over their recent run. Much of their attacking threat comes through P. Neumann (2 goals), Carlos Vicente (2 goals), L. Millar (1 goals), with creative support from L. Millar (3 assists), A. Cochrane (1 assists), A. Priske (1 assists), while at the back they have looked very solid. At home, their split return of 0 wins, 4 draws, and 0 losses fits a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are operating from a relatively stable mid-table position. Stylistically, they usually display balanced attacking football.
Placed 5 with 14 points from 9 outings, QPR continue to operate from a strong competitive position. The record of 3 wins, 5 draws, and 1 defeats, together with a 11:8 goal balance, points toward poor form and have been stuck in a sequence of draws. Much of their attacking threat comes through I. Chair (2 goals), P. Smyth (2 goals), J. Dunne (1 goals), with creative support from I. Chair (1 assists), R. Burrell (1 assists), A. Mbengue (1 assists), while at the back they have looked very solid. Away from home, they have returned 2 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses, a split that suggests a balanced but draw-heavy split record. They are pushing for upper-table objectives and still have something important to play for. In football terms, they tend to show balanced attacking football.
Across those 15 head-to-head meetings, Birmingham won 5 times, QPR won 6 times, while 4 matches finished as draws. The aggregate score in this matchup is 16:19 from Birmingham's perspective. 7 of those games went over 2.5 goals, and both teams scored in 7 matches, with an average of 2.33 goals per game.
Standings
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16:8 | 8 | 23 |
L
W
W
W
W
|
|
| 2 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 30:12 | 18 | 22 |
W
W
D
D
W
|
|
| 3 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 22:16 | 6 | 22 |
D
W
W
D
D
|
|
| 4 |
Birmingham
Home
|
11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 20:11 | 9 | 20 |
W
W
W
D
W
|
| 5 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 15:12 | 3 | 20 |
W
W
L
L
D
|
|
| 6 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 18:16 | 2 | 19 |
W
L
W
W
W
|
|
| 7 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 21:10 | 11 | 17 |
D
W
W
L
W
|
|
| 8 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 18:15 | 3 | 17 |
W
L
L
W
W
|
|
| 9 |
QPR
Away
|
11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 15:12 | 3 | 17 |
L
W
D
D
D
|
| 10 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 17:16 | 1 | 15 |
L
W
W
D
W
|
|
| 11 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 15:14 | 1 | 15 |
W
L
W
L
L
|
|
| 12 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 18:18 | 0 | 15 |
D
L
W
D
D
|
|
| 13 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 13:13 | 0 | 14 |
W
W
L
D
D
|
|
| 14 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 15:16 | -1 | 14 |
W
L
D
W
L
|
|
| 15 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 15:18 | -3 | 14 |
D
W
L
W
W
|
|
| 16 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 12:15 | -3 | 14 |
L
L
D
W
L
|
|
| 17 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 10:15 | -5 | 14 |
L
D
D
L
D
|
|
| 18 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 9:19 | -10 | 12 |
D
L
L
L
W
|
|
| 19 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 18:17 | 1 | 11 |
D
W
L
W
L
|
|
| 20 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 10:19 | -9 | 11 |
W
L
L
L
L
|
|
| 21 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 17:21 | -4 | 9 |
L
L
L
L
L
|
|
| 22 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 16:21 | -5 | 8 |
L
D
W
D
L
|
|
| 23 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9:20 | -11 | 6 |
L
L
D
D
L
|
|
| 24 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9:24 | -15 | 4 |
L
L
L
D
L
|